Premature rupture of membranes ≥ 37 weeks of gestation: Predictive factors for labour onset within 24 hours

被引:7
作者
Huret, C. [1 ]
Pereira, B. [2 ]
Collange, V. [1 ]
Delabaere, A. [1 ,4 ]
Rouzaire, M. [4 ]
Lemery, D. [1 ]
Sapin, V. [3 ,4 ]
Gallot, D. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] CHU Clermont Ferrand, CHU Estaing, Pole Femme & Enfant, 1 Pl Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, F-63003 Clermont Ferrand 1, France
[2] CHU Clermont Ferrand, Dept Med Informat, 58 Rue Montalembert, F-63003 Clermont Ferrand 1, France
[3] CHU Clermont Ferrand, Biochim Med, 58 Rue Montalembert, F-63003 Clermont Ferrand 1, France
[4] Univ Auvergne, Fac Med, R2D2 EA7281, Pl Henri Dunant, F-63000 Clermont Ferrand, France
来源
GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE | 2017年 / 45卷 / 06期
关键词
Premature rupture of membranes; Subclinical rupture of membranes; Expectative management; Labor induction; EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT; PRELABOR RUPTURE; TERM;
D O I
10.1016/j.gofs.2017.05.001
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives. - To identify predictive criteria for a positive expectation in the context of rupture of membranes after 37 WG. Methods. - Single-center retrospective study including ROM >= 37 WG. The primary outcome was labour onset within 24 hours. We compared predictive factors for occurrence of spontaneous labour and described obstetrical and neonatal outcomes according to initial Bishop score < 6 or >= 6. Results. - From January 2013 to December 2014, 520 patients were included. The predictive factors in case of unfavorable cervix were clinical leakage (P < 0.001) and a cervical dilatation >= 2 cm (P < 0.001) according to multivariate analysis. When the expectancy failed, there was a higher rate of cesarean section (24.3% vs. 9.6% P < 0.001) but no more proven maternal-fetal infection. In case of Bishop >= 6, we identified no predictive factor for labour onset but Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes (18.7% vs. 3.2% P = 0.01) and admission to neonatal unit (18.8% vs. 3.2% P = 0.04) were more frequent without majoration of maternal fetal infection. Conclusion. - The favorable expectation was the outcome for 70.8% of ROM at term. Clinical leakage and dilated cervix appeared as the main predictors in case of Bishop < 6. Majoration of low Apgar score and admission to neonatal unit could be increased when no labour onset occurred despite Bishop >= 6. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 352
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Accoceberry M, 2005, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, V33, P577, DOI 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2005.07.012
[2]  
Audra P, 2010, RUPTURE PREMATUREE M
[3]   Rupture of membranes: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, consequences and management [J].
Blanchon, L. ;
Accoceberry, M. ;
Belville, C. ;
Delabaere, A. ;
Prat, C. ;
Lemery, D. ;
Sapin, V. ;
Gallot, D. .
JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2013, 42 (02) :105-116
[4]  
CAMMU H, 1990, OBSTET GYNECOL, V76, P671
[5]  
CNGOF, 1999, J GYNECOL OBST BIO R, V28, P606
[6]   Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more) [J].
Dare, MR ;
Middleton, P ;
Crowther, CA ;
Flenady, VJ ;
Varatharaju, B .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (01)
[7]   Premature rupture of the membranes in term patients [J].
Duff, P .
SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 1996, 20 (05) :401-408
[8]   Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term [J].
Hannah, ME ;
Ohlsson, A ;
Farine, D ;
Hewson, SA ;
Hodnett, ED ;
Myhr, TL ;
Wang, EEL ;
Weston, JA ;
Willan, AR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (16) :1005-1010
[9]   Premature rupture of membranes at term: A metaanalysis of three management schemes [J].
Mozurkewich, EL ;
Wolf, FM .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (06) :1035-1043
[10]   Premature rupture of membranes at term in low risk women: how long should we wait in the "latent phase"? [J].
Pintucci, Armando ;
Meregalli, Virginio ;
Colombo, Paolo ;
Fiorilli, Angelo .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (02) :189-196