Do Family Proxies Get It Right? Concordance in Reports of Nursing Home Residents' Everyday Preferences

被引:29
作者
Heid, Allison R. [1 ]
Bangerter, Lauren R. [2 ]
Abbott, Katherine M. [4 ]
Van Haitsma, Kimberly [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Rowan Univ, Sch Osteopath Med, New Jersey Inst Successful Aging, Stratford, NJ 08084 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Coll Nursing, Program Person Ctr Living Syst Care, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[4] Miami Univ, Gerontol, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[5] Madlyn & Leonard Abramson Ctr Jewish Life, N Wales, PA USA
关键词
preferences; nursing home residents; assessment; family support; PERSON-CENTERED CARE; PSYCHOSOCIAL PREFERENCES; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; OLDER-ADULTS; HEARING-LOSS; DEMENTIA; INVOLVEMENT; CAREGIVERS; VALUES; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1177/0733464815581485
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Limited work has examined how well family proxies understand nursing home residents' preferences. With 85 dyads of a nursing home resident and relative, we utilize descriptive statistics and multi-level modeling to examine the concordance in reports of importance ratings of 72 everyday preferences for residents. Results reveal significant mean differences at the p < .001 level between proxies and residents on 12 of 72 preferences; yet, perfect agreement in responses is poor and only increases when dichotomizing responses into an important versus not important outcome. Multi-level modeling further indicates that dyads are discrepant on reports of the importance of growth activities for residents, with residents reporting higher levels of importance than proxies. This discrepancy is associated with residents' hearing impairment and proxies' perception of resident openness. The findings highlight not only how proxies may be able to inform care for residents in nursing homes but also where further discussions are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 691
页数:25
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, HIERARCHICAL LINEAR
[2]  
Applebaum R.A., 2000, ASSESSING SATISFACTI
[3]  
Baltes P.B., 2005, CAMBRIDGE HDB AGE AG, P47, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511610714.006, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511610714.006]
[4]   A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span [J].
Berg, Cynthia A. ;
Upchurch, Renn .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 133 (06) :920-954
[5]  
Brooker D., 2005, Dementia care mapping: Principles and practice
[6]   Self-Other Knowledge Asymmetries in Personality Pathology [J].
Carlson, Erika N. ;
Vazire, Simine ;
Oltmanns, Thomas F. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2013, 81 (02) :155-170
[7]   The psychosocial preferences of older adults: A pilot examination of content and structure [J].
Carpenter, BD ;
Van Haitsma, K ;
Ruckdeschel, K ;
Lawton, MP .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2000, 40 (03) :335-348
[8]   Preferences and life evaluations of older adults with and without dementia: Reliability, stability, and proxy knowledge [J].
Carpenter, Brian D. ;
Kissel, Emily C. ;
Lee, Monica M. .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2007, 22 (03) :650-655
[9]   Adult children as informants about parent's psychosocial preferences [J].
Carpenter, Brian D. ;
Lee, Monica ;
Ruckdeschel, Katy ;
Van Haitsma, Kimberly S. ;
Feldman, Penny H. .
FAMILY RELATIONS, 2006, 55 (05) :552-563
[10]  
Chappell N.L., 2007, Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, V6, P527, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1471301207084372, https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301207084372]