A model for assessing the cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin and simvastatin in achieving Canadian low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets

被引:7
|
作者
Lachaine, Jean
Merikle, Elizabeth
Tarride, Jean-Eric
Montpetit, Martin
Rinfret, Stephane
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Fac Pharm, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Pfizer Canada Inc, Outcomes Res, Kirkland, PQ, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
hyperlipidemia; lipoproteins; health economics; risk factors;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(07)80089-0
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is an important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease. Statins differ in their LDL-C-lowering effects and acquisition costs. Atorvastatin and simvastatin are the 2 most commonly used statins in Canada. Objective: This analysis compared the cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin and generic simvastatin in terms of annual drug cost per patient treated to Canadian LDL-C targets. It was conducted from the perspective of the Canadian provincial drug-reimbursement plans. Methods: A hypothetical cohort of 1000 dyslipidemic patients was assigned baseline LDL-C serum concentrations and levels of risk for CV disease based on Canadian population data. Canadian data on statin dosing were combined with efficacy data from a published meta-analysis to determine the proportion of patients who would be expected to achieve LDL-C targets after treatment with atorvastatin or generic simvastatin. Statin acquisition costs were obtained from Ontario and Quebec and reported in 2005 Canadian dollars. The sensitivity of the model to changes in drug costs, effectiveness, and persistence with treatment was tested. Results: The model predicted that more patients would reach the LDL-C target with atorvastatin than with simvastatin (73% vs 57%, respectively). The mean annual drug cost per patient treated to target was $54 higher with atorvastatin ($905 vs $851). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, measured as annual drug cost per additional patient treated to target with atorvastatin, was $1088. The model was sensitive to drug cost and effectiveness assumptions. Incorporating real-life rates of adherence into the model had no significant impact on the results. Conclusion: In this hypothetical cohort of dyslipidemic patients, treatment with atorvastatin would allow achievement of LDL-C targets in more patients than treatment with simvastatin, at an annual incremental cost of $1088 per additional patient treated to target. (Clin Ther. 2007;29:519-528) Copyright (c) 2007 Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 528
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost Effectiveness of Achieving Targets of Low-Density Lipoprotein Particle Number Versus Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level
    Grabner, Michael
    Winegar, Deborah A.
    Punekar, Rajeshwari S.
    Quimbo, Ralph A.
    Cziraky, Mark J.
    Cromwell, William C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 119 (03): : 404 - 409
  • [2] Managing to low-density lipoprotein particles compared with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Rizzo, John A.
    Mallow, Peter J.
    Waters, Heidi C.
    Pokrywka, Gregory S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LIPIDOLOGY, 2013, 7 (06) : 642 - 652
  • [3] COMPARISON OF CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS BETWEEN PATIENTS ACHIEVING LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN PARTICLE TARGETS AND PATIENTS ACHIEVING LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL TARGETS
    Jacobson, Terry A.
    Grabner, Michael
    Punekar, Rajeshwari
    Quimbo, Ralph A.
    Cziraky, Mark
    Winegar, Deborah
    Toth, Peter
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (12) : A1462 - A1462
  • [4] The cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin, rosuvastatin and simvastatin in treating patients to LDL-cholesterol targets
    Niskanen, L.
    Peura, P. K.
    Hallinen, T.
    Soini, E.
    Martikainen, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 : 860 - 860
  • [5] Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in addition to nonpharmacological risk factor modification for achieving new low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets
    Liska, Branislav
    Khattab, Ahmed A.
    Herrmann, Lutz
    Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
    Westphal, Ronja
    Toelg, Ralph
    Geist, Volker
    Richardt, Gert
    HERZ, 2008, 33 (05) : 362 - 367
  • [6] Cost effectiveness of Rosuvastatin in treating patients to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals compared with Atorvastatin, Pravastatin, and Simvastatin (a US analysis of the STELLAR trial)
    Miller, PSJ
    Smith, DG
    Jones, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 95 (11): : 1314 - 1319
  • [7] Cardiovascular risk in patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and particle targets
    Toth, Peter P.
    Grabner, Michael
    Punekar, Rajeshwari S.
    Quimbo, Ralph A.
    Cziraky, Mark J.
    Jacobson, Terry A.
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2014, 235 (02) : 585 - 591
  • [8] The cost-effectiveness of intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering in people with peripheral artery disease
    Nastasi, Domenico R.
    Moxon, Joseph, V
    Norman, Richard
    Trollope, Alexandra F.
    Rowbotham, Sophie
    Quigley, Frank
    Jenkins, Jason
    Golledge, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 73 (04) : 1396 - +
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness of Financial Incentives for Patients and Physicians to Manage Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels
    Pandya, Ankur
    Asch, David A.
    Volpp, Kevin G.
    Sy, Stephen
    Troxel, Andrea B.
    Zhu, Jingsan
    Weinstein, Milton C.
    Rosenthal, Meredith B.
    Gaziano, Thomas A.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2018, 1 (05) : e182008
  • [10] Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets in 2003
    Faergeman, O
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2003, 5 (0D) : D3 - D7