Moving Minor Hand Surgeries Out of the Operating Room and Into the Office-Based Procedure Room: A Population-Based Trend Analysis

Purpose Our primary purpose was to quantify the proportion of minor hand surgeries per-formed in the procedure room (PR) setting in a population-based cohort. Given the increase in the literature that has emerged since the mid-2000s highlighting the benefits of the PR setting, we hypothesized that a trend analysis would reveal increased utilization over time. Methods We used the 2006-2017 MarketScan Commercial Database to identify adults who underwent isolated minor hand surgeries performed in PR and operation room surgical set-tings in the United States. The Cochran-Armitage trends test was used to determine whether the proportion of all procedures (PR thorn operation room) changed over time. Results A total of 257,581 surgeries were included in the analysis, of which 24,966 (11.5%) were performed in the PR. There was an increase in the overall number of surgeries under study as well as increased utilization of the PR setting for open carpal tunnel release, trigger digit release, DeQuervain release, hand or finger mass excision, and hand or finger cyst excision. The magnitude of the increases in PR utilization was small: between 2006 and 2017, the PR utilization increased by 1.4% for open carpal tunnel release, 5.4% for trigger digit release, 2.9% for DeQuervain release, 10.1% for hand or finger mass excision, and 6.5% for hand or finger cyst excision. Conclusions Despite the published benefits of the PR setting, we observed that the majority of these 5 common minor hand surgeries are performed in the operation room setting. Between 2006 and 2017, the office-based PR utilization increased slightly. The identification of bar-riers to PR utilization is needed to improve the value of care. (J Hand Surg Am. 2022;47(12):1137-1145. Copyright (c) 2022 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.)