Not an open cluster after all: the NGC 6863 asterism in Aquila

被引:8
|
作者
Moni Bidin, C. [1 ]
de la Fuente Marcos, R. [2 ]
de la Fuente Marcos, C. [2 ]
Carraro, G. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Concepcion, Dept Astron, Concepcion, Chile
[2] Suffolk Univ Madrid Campus, Madrid 28003, Spain
[3] European So Observ, Santiago 19, Chile
[4] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Astron, I-35122 Padua, Italy
基金
美国国家航空航天局; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
open clusters and associations: individual: NGC 6863; open clusters and associations: individual: NGC 1901; open clusters and associations: general; Galaxy: evolution; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITIONS; EVOLUTIONARY TRACKS; GALACTIC DISK; REMNANTS; STARS; CANDIDATES; ABUNDANCES; BINARIES; CATALOG;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/200912761
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Context. Shortly after birth, open clusters start dissolving; gradually losing stars into the surrounding star field. The time scale for complete disintegration depends both on their initial membership and location within the Galaxy. Open clusters undergoing the terminal phase of cluster disruption or open cluster remnants (OCRs) are notoriously difficult to identify. From an observational point, a combination of low number statistics and minimal contrast against the general stellar field conspire to turn them into very challenging objects. To make the situation even worst, random samples of field stars often display features that may induce to classify them erroneously as extremely evolved open clusters. Aims. In this paper, we provide a detailed study of the stellar content and kinematics of NGC 6863, a compact group of a few stars located in Aquila and described by the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey as a non existent cluster. Nonetheless, this object has been recently classified as OCR. The aim of the present work is to either confirm or disprove its OCR status by a detailed star-by-star analysis. Methods. The analysis is performed using wide-field photometry in the UBVI pass-band, proper motions from the UCAC3 catalogue, and high resolution spectroscopy as well as results from extensive N-body calculations. Results. The spectra of the four brightest stars in this field clearly indicate that they are part of different populations. Their radial velocities are statistically very different and their spectroscopic parallaxes are inconsistent with them being part of a single, bound stellar system. Out of the four stars, only two of them have similar metallicity. The color magnitude diagram for the field of NGC 6863 does not show any clear signature typical of actual open clusters. Consistently, spatial scan statistics confirms the absence of any statistically significant, kinematically supported over-density at the purported location of NGC 6863. Conclusions. Our results show that the four brightest stars commonly associated to NGC 6863 form an asterism, a group of non-physically associated stars projected together, leading to the conclusion that NGC 6863 is not a real open cluster.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Search for variable stars in the open cluster NGC 1245
    Shen, Dong-Xiang
    Zhang, Yu
    Li, Chun-Yan
    Zeng, Xiang-Yun
    Lu, Guo-Liang
    Zhu, Chun-Hua
    Hu, Qing-Shun
    Liu, Jin-Zhong
    RESEARCH IN ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS, 2021, 21 (05)
  • [2] A NEW LOOK AT OPEN CLUSTER NGC 6520
    Odell, Andrew P.
    ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 147 (01)
  • [3] VARIABLE STARS IN THE OPEN CLUSTER NGC 7142
    Sandquist, Eric L.
    Serio, Andrew W.
    Shetrone, Matthew
    ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 142 (06)
  • [4] Solving the distance discrepancy for the open cluster NGC 2453 The planetary nebula NGC 2452 is not a cluster member
    Gonzalez-Diaz, D.
    Bidin, C. Moni
    Silva-Villa, E.
    Carraro, G.
    Majaess, D.
    Moitinho, A.
    Orquera-Rojas, C.
    Marin, C. A. L. Morales
    Morales-Campana, E.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2019, 626
  • [5] Characterization and photometric membership of the open cluster NGC 1981
    Maia, F. F. S.
    Corradi, W. J. B.
    Santos, J. F. C., Jr.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 407 (03) : 1875 - 1886
  • [6] MOST observations of the young open cluster NGC 2264
    Zwintz, K.
    Hareter, M.
    Kuschnig, R.
    Amado, P. J.
    Nesvacil, N.
    Rodriguez, E.
    Diaz-Fraile, D.
    Weiss, W. W.
    Pribulla, T.
    Guenther, D. B.
    Matthews, J. M.
    Moffat, A. F. J.
    Rucinski, S. M.
    Sasselov, D.
    Walker, G. A. H.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2009, 502 (01) : 239 - 252
  • [7] Variable Star Population in the Open Cluster NGC 6819 Observed by the Kepler Spacecraft
    Sanjayan, S.
    Baran, A. S.
    Nemeth, P.
    Kinemuchi, K.
    ACTA ASTRONOMICA, 2022, 72 (04): : 267 - 295
  • [8] TWO BARIUM STARS IN THE OPEN CLUSTER NGC 5822
    Santrich, O. J. Katime
    Pereira, C. B.
    de Castro, D. B.
    ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 146 (02)
  • [9] Analysis of the Open Cluster NGC 2281
    Terrell, Dirk
    Gross, John
    Cooney, Walter R., Jr.
    GALAXIES, 2021, 9 (01): : 1 - 12
  • [10] Be STARS IN THE OPEN CLUSTER NGC 6830
    Yu, Po-Chieh
    Lin, Chien-Cheng
    Lin, Hsing-Wen
    Lee, Chien-De
    Konidaris, Nick
    Ngeow, Chow-Choong
    Ip, Wing-Huen
    Chen, Wen-Ping
    Chen, Hui-Chen
    Malkan, Matthew A.
    Chang, Chan-Kao
    Laher, Russ
    Huang, Li-Ching
    Cheng, Yu-Chi
    Edelson, Rick
    Ritter, Andreas
    Quimby, Robert
    Ben-Ami, Sagi
    Ofek, Eran. O.
    Surace, Jason
    Kulkarni, Shrinivas R.
    ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 151 (05)