Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Two Sugar Beet Cultivars with Contrasting Drought Tolerance

被引:20
|
作者
Wang, Yuguang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Peng, Chunxue [1 ]
Zhan, Yanan [1 ]
Yu, Lihua [1 ,2 ]
Li, Mao [1 ]
Li, Jing [3 ]
Geng, Gui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Heilongjiang Univ, Key Lab Sugar Beet Genet Breeding Heilongjiang Pr, Harbin 150080, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Heilongjiang Univ, Crop Acad, Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Sugar Beet Res Inst, Harbin 150080, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[3] Northeast Agr Univ, Coll Life Sci, Harbin 150030, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Drought; Sugar beet; Relative water content; Proteomics; Mass spectrometry; BETA-VULGARIS L; CYNODON-DACTYLON; STRESS-RESPONSE; PHOTOSYSTEM-II; ABIOTIC STRESS; SALT; LEAVES; IDENTIFICATION; ACCUMULATION; PEROXIDASE;
D O I
10.1007/s00344-017-9703-9
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
In a changing climate, drought stress accounts for significant crop yield loss. To test the hypothesis that proteins play an important role in plant drought tolerance, we conducted physiological and proteomic analyses to investigate the stress responses of two sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars with contrasting tolerance to drought stress. Under drought, the tolerant cultivar had higher relative water content, root length, dry weight, and root system area than the drought-sensitive cultivar. In addition, the tolerant cultivar had higher antioxidant enzyme activities than the sensitive cultivar to prevent ROS damage under drought stress conditions. Proteomic analysis resulted in identification of 23 and 27 drought-responsive proteins in the sensitive and tolerant cultivars, respectively. Based on their functions, these proteins were classified into nine categories. Many proteins in several different biological processes showed different abundance patterns between the genotypes (for example, oxygen-evolving enhancer proteins, choline monooxygenase, and malate dehydrogenase). Although some proteins changed similarly in trend between the two genotypes, they showed different levels of changes (for example, S-adenosylmethionine synthase). Furthermore, the poor correlation between transcription and protein levels was confirmed in this study. Our findings would lead to an improved understanding of the integrated physiology and proteome responses of the different sugar beet genotypes under drought stress.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 549
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Two Sugar Beet Cultivars with Contrasting Drought Tolerance
    Yuguang Wang
    Chunxue Peng
    Yanan Zhan
    Lihua Yu
    Mao Li
    Jing Li
    Gui Geng
    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2017, 36 : 537 - 549
  • [2] Comparative Physiological and Proteomic Analysis of Two Sugar Beet Genotypes with Contrasting Salt Tolerance
    Wang, Yuguang
    Stevanato, Piergiorgio
    Lv, Chunhua
    Li, Renren
    Geng, Gui
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2019, 67 (21) : 6056 - 6073
  • [3] Comparative proteomic analysis of two contrasting cultivars reveals the mechanism of sugar beet response to freezing stress
    Wang, Lihua
    Geng, Gui
    Pi, Zhi
    Xu, Yao
    Liu, Yu
    Li, Renren
    Wang, Maoqian
    Wang, Gang
    Stevanato, Piergiorgio
    Yu, Lihua
    Wang, Yuguang
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2023, 213
  • [4] Comparative physiology and proteomic analysis of two wheat genotypes contrasting in drought tolerance
    Faghani, Elham
    Gharechahi, Javad
    Komatsu, Setsuko
    Mirzaei, Mehdi
    Khavarinejad, Raman Ali
    Najafi, Farzaneh
    Farsad, Laleh Karimi
    Salekdeh, Ghasern Hosseini
    JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS, 2015, 114 : 1 - 15
  • [5] Comparative proteomic analysis of drought tolerance in the two contrasting Tibetan wild genotypes and cultivated genotype
    Wang, Nanbo
    Zhao, Jing
    He, Xiaoyan
    Sun, Hongyan
    Zhang, Guoping
    Wu, Feibo
    BMC GENOMICS, 2015, 16
  • [6] Comparative proteomic analysis of drought tolerance in the two contrasting Tibetan wild genotypes and cultivated genotype
    Nanbo Wang
    Jing Zhao
    Xiaoyan He
    Hongyan Sun
    Guoping Zhang
    Feibo Wu
    BMC Genomics, 16
  • [7] Data in support of comparative physiology and proteomic analysis of two wheat genotypes contrasting in drought tolerance
    Faghani, Elham
    Gharechahi, Javad
    Komatsu, Setsuko
    Mirzaei, Mehdi
    Khavarinejad, Ramzan Ali
    Najafi, Farzaneh
    Farsad, Laleh Karimi
    Salekdeh, Ghasem Hosseini
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2015, 2 : 26 - 28
  • [8] Comparative Analysis of Drought Responsive Proteins in Kentucky Bluegrass Cultivars Contrasting in Drought Tolerance
    Xu, Chenping
    Huang, Bingru
    CROP SCIENCE, 2010, 50 (06) : 2543 - 2552
  • [9] Proteomic Analysis of Two Rice Varieties with Contrasting Drought Tolerance at Reproductive Stage
    Huang, Wei
    Bi, Ting
    Feng, Fangjun
    Ma, Xiaosong
    Pan, Jing
    Lou, Qiaojun
    Mei, Hanwei
    Sun, Weining
    Current Proteomics, 2016, 13 (03) : 218 - 230
  • [10] ADAPTABILITY TO DROUGHT IN SUGAR-BEET CULTIVARS
    STAJNER, D
    MIMICADUKIC, N
    GASIC, O
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1995, 37 (01) : 107 - 112