Outcomes of endoscopic discectomy compared with open microdiscectomy and tubular microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniations: a meta-analysis

被引:61
|
作者
Barber, Sean M. [1 ]
Nakhla, Jonathan [1 ]
Konakondla, Sanjay [1 ]
Fridley, Jared S. [1 ]
Oyelese, Adetokunbo A. [1 ]
Gokaslan, Ziya L. [1 ]
Telfeian, Albert E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Rhode Isl Hosp, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Dept Neurosurg, Providence, RI 02903 USA
关键词
herniated disc; microdiscectomy; minimally invasive; endoscopy; spine surgery; lumbar; FOLLOW-UP; SCIATICA; SURGERY; MICRODISKECTOMY;
D O I
10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19532
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Endoscopic discectomy (ED) has been advocated as a less-invasive alternative to open microdiscectomy (OM) and tubular microdiscectomy (TM) for lumbar disc herniations, with the potential to decrease postoperative pain and shorten recovery times. Large-scale, objective comparisons of outcomes between ED, OM, and TM, however, are lacking. The authors' objective in this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of ED, OM, and TM. METHODS The PubMed database was searched for articles published as of February 1, 2019, for comparative studies reporting outcomes of some combination of ED, OM, and TM. A meta-analysis of outcome parameters was performed assuming random effects. RESULTS Twenty-six studies describing the outcomes of 2577 patients were included. Estimated blood loss was significantly higher with OM than with both TM (p = 0.01) and ED (p < 0.00001). Length of stay was significantly longer with OM than with ED (p < 0.00001). Return to work time was significantly longer in OM than with ED (p = 0.001). Postoperative leg (p = 0.02) and back (p = 0.01) VAS scores, and Oswestry Disability Index scores (p = 0.006) at latest follow-up were significantly higher for OM than for ED. Serum creatine phosphokinase (p = 0.02) and C-reactive protein (p < 0.00001) levels on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher with OM than with ED. CONCLUSIONS Outcomes of TM and OM for lumbar disc herniations are largely equivalent. While this analysis demonstrated that several clinical variables were significantly improved in patients undergoing ED when compared with OM, the magnitude of many of these differences was small and of uncertain clinical relevance, and several of the included studies were retrospective and subject to a high risk of bias. Further high-quality prospective studies are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding the comparative efficacy of the various surgical treatments for lumbar disc herniations.
引用
收藏
页码:802 / 815
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A meta-analysis
    Ruan, Wenfeng
    Feng, Fan
    Liu, Zhengye
    Xie, Jiangtao
    Cai, Lin
    Ping, Ansong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 31 : 86 - 92
  • [2] A Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation in the Korean: A Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Manyoung
    Lee, Sol
    Kim, Hyeun-Sung
    Park, Sangyoon
    Shim, Sang-Yeup
    Lim, Dong-Ju
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [3] Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Open Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Gadjradj, Pravesh S.
    Harhangi, Biswadjiet S.
    Amelink, Jantijn
    van Susante, Job
    Kamper, Steven
    van Tulder, Maurits
    Peul, Wilco C.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen
    Rubinstein, Sidney M.
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (08) : 538 - 549
  • [4] Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Recurrent Disc Herniation
    Lee, Dong Yeob
    Shim, Chan Shik
    Ahn, Yong
    Choi, Young-Geun
    Kim, Ho Jin
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 46 (06) : 515 - 521
  • [5] Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Feng, Zihe
    Zhao, Zhiheng
    Cui, Wei
    Meng, Xianglong
    Hai, Yong
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (06) : 2139 - 2153
  • [6] Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Posterior Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Qin, Rongqing
    Liu, Baoshan
    Hao, Jie
    Zhou, Pin
    Yao, Yu
    Zhang, Feng
    Chen, Xiaoqing
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 120 : 352 - 362
  • [7] Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy as an Alternative to Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Large Lumbar Disc Herniation
    Choi, Kyung-Chul
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    Park, Choon-Keun
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2016, 19 (02) : E291 - E300
  • [8] Outcomes of Endoscopic Microdiscectomy versus Conventional Discectomy for Lumbar Spine Disc Diseases
    Khan, Hameedullah
    Rauf, Abdul
    Qureshi, Abdul Samad
    Memon, Riaz Ahmed Raja
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (04): : 1485 - 1487
  • [9] Peer review report 1 on "Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A meta-analysis"
    Foead, Agus Iwan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 25 : 280 - 281
  • [10] Complications of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy versus Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Chao-Chun
    Chen, Chien-Min
    Lin, Martin Hsiu-Chu
    Huang, Wei-Chao
    Lee, Ming-Hsueh
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    Chen, Kuo-Tai
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 168 : 333 - 348