Analysis of Regional Distribution of Tree Species Using Multi-Seasonal Sentinel-1&2 Imagery within Google Earth Engine

被引:18
作者
Xie, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Chunxiang [1 ]
Xu, Min [1 ]
Duerler, Robert Shea [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Xinwei [1 ]
Bashir, Barjeece [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yiyu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Kaimin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, State Key Lab Remote Sensing Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
来源
FORESTS | 2021年 / 12卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
multisensor; tree species; large areas; cloud-computing; machine learning; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; RANDOM FOREST; RGB-IMAGERY; LANDSAT MSS; CLASSIFICATION; VEGETATION; MACHINE; COVER; MANGROVE; TM;
D O I
10.3390/f12050565
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Accurate information on tree species is in high demand for forestry management and further investigations on biodiversity and environmental monitoring. Over regional or large areas, distinguishing tree species at high resolutions faces the challenges of a lack of representative features and computational power. A novel methodology was proposed to delineate the explicit spatial distribution of six dominant tree species (Pinus tabulaeformis, Quercus mongolia, Betula spp., Populus spp., Larix spp., and Armeniaca sibirica) and one residual class at 10 m resolution. Their spatial patterns were analyzed over an area covering over 90,000 km(2) using the analysis-ready large volume of multisensor imagery within the Google Earth engine (GEE) platform afterwards. Random forest algorithm built into GEE was used together with the 20th and 80th percentiles of multitemporal features extracted from Sentinel-1/2, and topographic features. The composition of tree species in natural forests and plantations at the city and county-level were performed in detail afterwards. The classification achieved a reliable accuracy (77.5% overall accuracy, 0.71 kappa), and the spatial distribution revealed that plantations (Pinus tabulaeformis, Populus spp., Larix spp., and Armeniaca sibirica) outnumber natural forests (Quercus mongolia and Betula spp.) by 6% and were mainly concentrated in the northern and southern regions. Arhorchin had the largest forest area of over 4500 km(2), while Hexingten and Aohan ranked first in natural forest and plantation area. Additionally, the class proportion of the number of tree species in Karqin and Ningcheng was more balanced. We suggest focusing more on the suitable areas modeling for tree species using species' distribution models and environmental factors based on the classification results rather than field survey plots in further studies.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Enhancing Forest and Shrubland Mapping in a Managed Forest Landscape with Landsat-LiDAR Data Fusion
    Adams, Bryce T.
    Matthews, Stephen N.
    [J]. NATURAL AREAS JOURNAL, 2018, 38 (05) : 402 - 418
  • [2] Exploiting machine learning algorithms for tree species classification in a semiarid woodland using RapidEye image
    Adelabu, Samuel
    Mutanga, Onisimo
    Adam, Elhadi
    Cho, Moses Azong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 7
  • [3] Mapping Urban Tree Species Using Very High Resolution Satellite Imagery: Comparing Pixel-Based and Object-Based Approaches
    Agarwal, Shivani
    Vailshery, Lionel Sujay
    Jaganmohan, Madhumitha
    Nagendra, Harini
    [J]. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2013, 2 (01) : 220 - 236
  • [4] Species discrimination and individual tree detection for predicting main dendrometric characteristics in mixed temperate forests by use of airborne laser scanning and ultra-high-resolution imagery
    Apostol, Bogdan
    Petrila, Marius
    Lorent, Adrian
    Ciceu, Albert
    Gancz, Vladimir
    Badea, Ovidiu
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 698 (698)
  • [5] Feature and Deep Learning in Remote Sensing Applications
    Ball, John E.
    Anderson, Derek T.
    Chan, Chee Seng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 11
  • [6] Tree Species Classification Using Hyperspectral Imagery: A Comparison of Two Classifiers
    Ballanti, Laurel
    Blesius, Leonhard
    Hines, Ellen
    Kruse, Bill
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (06)
  • [7] Object based image analysis for remote sensing
    Blaschke, T.
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 65 (01) : 2 - 16
  • [8] INDIVIDUAL TREE SPECIES CLASSIFICATION USING AIRBORNE HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY AND LIDAR DATA
    Burai, Peter
    Beko, Laszlo
    Lenart, Csaba
    Tomor, Tamas
    Kovacs, Zoltan
    [J]. 2019 10TH WORKSHOP ON HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING AND SIGNAL PROCESSING - EVOLUTION IN REMOTE SENSING (WHISPERS), 2019,
  • [9] Estimation of land-use/land-cover changes associated with energy footprints and other disturbance agents in the Upper Peace Region of Alberta Canada from 1985 to 2015 using Landsat data
    Chowdhury, Subir
    Peddle, Derek R.
    Wulder, Michael A.
    Heckbert, Scott
    Shipman, Todd C.
    Chao, Dennis K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2021, 94
  • [10] CALCULATING THE VEGETATION INDEX FASTER
    CRIPPEN, RE
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1990, 34 (01) : 71 - 73