Young primary students making sense of text and illustrations about how refuse can become soil

被引:1
作者
Aberg-Bengtsson, Lisbeth [1 ]
Beach, Dennis [2 ,3 ]
Ljung-Djarf, Agneta [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Boras, Dept Educ Res & Dev, Educ, Boras, Sweden
[2] Univ Boras, Dept Educ Res & Dev, Boras, Sweden
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Educ & Special Educ, Educ, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Kristianstad Univ, Sch Educ & Environm, Educ, Kristianstad, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
environmental education; illustrations as support to text; making of meaning composting refuse; young primary students; COGNITIVE LOAD; MULTIMEDIA; REPRESENTATIONS; ENVIRONMENT; PICTURES;
D O I
10.1080/13504622.2015.1118750
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Explanatory pictures and models are frequently used in teaching and learning situations. However, it seems to be simply assumed that they are always beneficial. In this article results from an investigation with 16 Swedish pupils aged 7-9year are presented based on an analysis that has examined how well this assumption holds up. Concepts from multi-modal theory have been used to investigate how young learners deal with illustrations and text from an early reader booklet about composting domestic refuse. The analysis suggests that expectations that illustrations facilitate the meaning-making of young pupils may be exaggerated. Although the booklet claimed to provide interactive support between image and text most of the examples show pupils ignoring pictures or misinterpreting vital information about composting in both the verbal and non-verbal material. The illustrations did not compensate for the most crucial deficiencies in the written text.
引用
收藏
页码:1150 / 1168
页数:19
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, MULTIMODALITY EXPLOR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Experience and education
[3]  
Barraza L., 2008, International Journal of Environmental Science Education, V3, P179
[4]  
Bowker R., 2007, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V13, P75, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620601122731, DOI 10.1080/13504620601122731, 10.1080/13504620601122731]
[5]   What's there, what if, what then, and what can we do? An immersive and embodied experience of environment and place through children's literature [J].
Burke, Geraldine ;
Cutter-Mackenzie, Amy .
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2010, 16 (3-4) :311-330
[6]   Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text [J].
Carney, RN ;
Levin, JR .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2002, 14 (01) :5-26
[7]  
Chawla L., 2007, Environmental Education Research, V13, P437, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13504620701581539, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701581539]
[8]   Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles [J].
Cook, Michelle Patrick .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2006, 90 (06) :1073-1091
[9]   Exploring a hydrological concept through children's drawings [J].
Dove, JE ;
Everett, LA ;
Preece, PFW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1999, 21 (05) :485-497
[10]   Balancing cohesion and tension in multimodal rhetoric. An interdisciplinary approach to the study of semiotic complexity [J].
Engebretsen, Martin .
LEARNING MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 37 (02) :145-162