A laboratory study for the treatment of arsenic, iron, and manganese bearing ground water using Fe3+ impregnated activated carbon:: Effects of shaking time, pH and temperature

被引:156
作者
Mondal, Prasenjit [1 ]
Balomajumder, Chandrajit [1 ]
Mohanty, Bikash [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Roorkee 247667, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.078
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper deals with the experimental investigation related to removal of arsenic from a simulated contaminated ground water by the adsorption onto Fe3+ impregnated granular activated carbon (GAC-Fe) in presence of Fe2+, Fe2+, and Mn2+. Similar study has also been done with granular activated carbon (GAC) for comparison. The effects of shaking time, pH, and temperature on the percentage removal of As(T), As(III), As(V), Fe2+, Fe2+, and Mn have been discussed. The shaking time for optimum removal of arsenic species has been noted as 8 h for GAC-Fe and 12 h for GAC, respectively. As(T) removal was less affected by the change in pH within the pH range of 2-11. Maximum removal of As(V) and As(Ill) was observed in the pH range of 5-7 and 9-11, respectively, for both the adsorbents. Under the experimental conditions at 30 degrees C, the optimum removal of As(T), As(III), As(V), Fe, and Mn are 95.5%, 93%, 98%, 100%, and 41%, respectively, when GAC-Fe is used. For GAC these values are 56%, 41%, 71%, 99%, and 98%. The adsorbent dose (AD) and its particle size (PS) for both GAC and GAC-Fe were 30 g/1 and 125-150 mu m, respectively. The initial arsenic concentration in the synthetic water sample was 200 ppb. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 426
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, 816D02005 EPA
[2]  
Edwards M, 1998, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V90, P103
[3]  
*EUR COMM DIR, 1998, REL DRINK WAT QUAL I
[4]   SURFACE-CHEMISTRY OF FERRIHYDRITE .2. KINETICS OF ARSENATE ADSORPTION AND COPRECIPITATION [J].
FULLER, CC ;
DAVIS, JA ;
WAYCHUNAS, GA .
GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1993, 57 (10) :2271-2282
[5]  
Goel R, 2004, INDIAN J CHEM TECHN, V11, P518
[6]   Mechanisms of arsenic adsorption on amorphous oxides evaluated using macroscopic measurements, vibrational spectroscopy, and surface complexation modeling [J].
Goldberg, S ;
Johnston, CT .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2001, 234 (01) :204-216
[7]  
HINKLE SR, 1999, 984205 USD INT
[8]  
HUANG CP, 1989, RES J WATER POLLUT C, V61, P1596
[9]   Immobilization mechanisms of arsenate in iron hydroxide sludge stabilized with cement [J].
Jing, CY ;
Korfiatis, GP ;
Meng, XG .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (21) :5050-5056
[10]   An overview of arsenic removal processes [J].
Kartinen, EO ;
Martin, CJ .
DESALINATION, 1995, 103 (1-2) :79-88