Can a 'rural day' make a difference to GP shortage across rural Germany?

被引:0
|
作者
Flum, E. [1 ]
Goetz, K. [1 ,2 ]
Berger, S. [1 ]
Ledig, T. [1 ]
Steinhaeuser, J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Gen Practice & Hlth Serv Res, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Inst Family Med, Campus Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
来源
RURAL AND REMOTE HEALTH | 2016年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
education; general practice; Germany; postgraduate training; primary care; training program; GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; RESPONSE RATES; HEALTH-CARE; PERSPECTIVES; COUNTRY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: The 'Verbundweiterbildung(plus) Baden-Wurttemberg' (Verbundweiterbildung(plus)) - a structured general practice (GP) postgraduate training program - developed a 'rural day' as an intervention to ensure rural health exposure for GP trainees. This project report presents the outcome of the intervention: intention to work in a rural area. Methods: At the time of the study, 500 GP trainees were enrolled in Verbundweiterbildung(plus). Invitations to complete an internet-based questionnaire were distributed by email to the 274 GP trainees who had previously been asked to participate in one of eight rural days. The questionnaire contained 4 generic and 10 specific items for participants in the rural days and 4 items specific to non-participants. Mixed-methods analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results: Of the 274 GP trainees invited to complete the questionnaire, 38 of 80 rural day participants and 72 of 194 non-participants completed the questionnaire (overall response rate 40%). Participants and non-participants did not differ significantly regarding age, sex and origin. Nearly half of the participants claimed the rural day changed their overall attitudes towards rural areas positively. However, there was no significant difference in the intention to work in a rural area for participants before and after the rural day experience. Conclusions: The rural day increased positive attitudes towards rural areas in general but had no influence on intention to work in rural practice. More awareness and responsibility regarding workforce shortages in rural primary health care among political stakeholders, trainers and trainees is needed. Duration of the intervention should be extended and possibly complemented by offering rotations in rural practices to increase the effect. Enabling factors and barriers regarding working in rural areas are already known by political stakeholders, trainers and trainees and need to be more adequately addressed during GP postgraduate training.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Building capacity to provide palliative care in rural and remote communities: Does education make a difference?
    Kelley, ML
    Habjan, S
    Aegard, J
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2004, 20 (04) : 308 - 315
  • [42] The nature, pervasiveness and manifestations of sexual harassment in rural Australia: Does 'masculinity' of workplace make a difference?
    Saunders, Skye
    Easteal, Patricia A. M.
    WOMENS STUDIES INTERNATIONAL FORUM, 2013, 40 : 121 - 131
  • [43] Can a rural community-based work-related activity program make a difference for chronic pain-disabled injured workers?
    Dunstan, Debra A.
    Covic, Tanya
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2007, 15 (03) : 166 - 171
  • [44] Cultural worldviews consistently explain bundles of ecosystem service prioritisation across rural Germany
    Peter, Sophie
    Le Provost, Gaetane
    Mehring, Marion
    Mueller, Thomas
    Manning, Peter
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2022, 4 (01) : 218 - 230
  • [45] The difference a day can make: The temporal dynamics of drinking water access and quality in urban slums
    Price, Heather
    Adams, Ellis
    Quilliam, Richard S.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 671 : 818 - 826
  • [46] Day at the Rural District Hospital: What Can We Learn about Healthcare Quality?
    Gaus, David
    Herrera, Diego
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2021, 105 (04): : 866 - 867
  • [47] Living with difference in rural Indonesia: What can be learned for national and regional political agendas?
    Carnegie, Michelle
    JOURNAL OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN STUDIES, 2010, 41 (03) : 449 - 481
  • [48] Urban or Rural: Does It Make A Difference for Economic Resilience? A Modelling Study on Economic and Cultural Geography in Romania
    Pavel, Alexandru
    Moldovan, Bogdan Andrei
    Kourtit, Karima
    Nijkamp, Peter
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [49] Does rural or urban residence make a difference to neonatal outcome in premature birth? A regional study in Australia
    Abdel-Latif, M. E.
    Bajuk, B.
    Oei, J.
    Vincent, T.
    Sutton, L.
    Lui, K.
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2006, 91 (04): : F251 - F256
  • [50] Intergenerational Support of Chinese Rural Elders With Migrant Children: Do Sons' or Daughters' Migrations Make a Difference?
    Guo, Man
    Chi, Iris
    Silverstein, Merril
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIAL WORK, 2009, 52 (05): : 534 - 554