Screening of women with aesthetic prostheses in dedicated sessions of a population-based breast cancer screening programme

被引:11
作者
Deandrea, Silvia [1 ]
Cavazzana, Laura [2 ]
Principi, Niccolo [2 ]
Luconi, Ester [3 ]
Campoleoni, Mauro [4 ]
Bastiampillai, Anan Judina [1 ]
Bracchi, Lucia [4 ]
Bucchi, Lauro [5 ]
Pedilarco, Stella [6 ]
Piscitelli, Antonio [2 ]
Sfondrini, Maria Silvia [6 ]
Silvestri, Anna Rita [1 ]
Castaldi, Silvana [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Protect Agcy Metropolitan City Milan, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Post Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Milan, Italy
[3] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Milan, Italy
[4] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Med Phys Unit, Milan, Italy
[5] IRST, Dino Amadori, IRCCS Ist Romagnolo Studio Tumori, Romagna Canc Registry,Romagna Canc Inst, Forli, Italy
[6] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Div Radiol, Milan, Italy
[7] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Milan, Italy
[8] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Qual Unit, Milan, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2021年 / 126卷 / 07期
关键词
Breast implants; Breast neoplasms; Diagnostic screening programmes; Mammography; IMAGE QUALITY; AUGMENTATION; DIAGNOSIS; IMPLANTS; MAMMOGRAPHY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-021-01357-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Women with aesthetic prostheses must be included in the target population of mammography screening programmes. Breast implants are radiopaque and partially obscure the breast tissue. This can be avoided with the use of the Eklund technique, which causes an increased radiation exposure. In this study, augmented women undergoing a dedicated protocol within a population-based screening programme were compared according to selected indicators with the standard screening population. Essential dosimetric parameters and their time trend were also assessed. Materials and methods The study was conducted in a screening centre in Milan in the years 2009-2016. The screening protocol for women with breast implants included a double-read mammography with the Eklund views, ultrasound and clinical breast examination. Results A total of 28,794 women were enrolled, including 588 (2%) women with breast implants and 28,206 (98%) undergoing the standard screening protocol. The invasive assessment rate was 9.0 parts per thousand for women with breast implants vs. 15 parts per thousand in the standard cohort. The surgical referral rate was 2.2% vs. 0.9%. The detection rate was similar in the two groups (4.0 and 4.5 parts per thousand, respectively). There were significant differences in the average glandular dose according to the mammography equipment. The use of the Eklund views increased over time. Conclusions Screening of augmented women according to a specific protocol in the contexts of population-based programmes is feasible. Observed differences in screening indicators relative to the standard screening population require further research. The increasing use of Eklund views probably results from quality assurance measures associated with screening programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 955
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [31] Mammography: an update of the EUSOBI recommendations on information for women
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    Fallenberg, Eva M.
    Clauser, Paola
    Trimboli, Rubina M.
    Camps-Herrero, Julia
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Forrai, Gabor
    [J]. INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2017, 8 (01): : 11 - 18
  • [32] MAMMOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENTS BEFORE AND AFTER AUGMENTATION MAMMAPLASTY
    SILVERSTEIN, MJ
    HANDEL, N
    GAMAGAMI, P
    WAISMAN, E
    GIERSON, ED
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1990, 86 (06) : 1126 - 1130
  • [33] Skinner KA, 2001, ANN SURG ONCOL, V8, P138
  • [34] Breast implants and breast cancer screening
    Smalley, SM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2003, 48 (05) : 329 - 337
  • [35] The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, 2002, BREAST IMAGING GUIDE
  • [36] Diagnosis, treatment, and management of breast cancer in previously augmented women
    Tuli, Richard
    Flynn, Ryan A.
    Brill, Kristin L.
    Sabol, Jennifer L.
    Usuki, Kenneth Y.
    Rosenberg, Anne L.
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2006, 12 (04) : 343 - 348
  • [37] U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health, 2011, FDA UPDATE SAFETY SI