Analysis of cost of component replacement versus entire device replacement during artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery

被引:4
|
作者
Yarlagadda, Vidhush K. [1 ]
Kilgore, Meredith L. [2 ]
Selph, John P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Publ Hlth, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
artificial; decision tree; urinary incontinence; urinary sphincter; IMPLANTATION; OUTCOMES; INCONTINENCE; DURABILITY; EXPERIENCE; FAILURES;
D O I
10.1002/nau.23533
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AimTo identify the costs of replacing an entire malfunctioning AUS device versus an individual component at the time of device malfunction. MethodsDecision analysis was performed by analyzing the costs associated with revising a malfunctioning artificial urinary sphincter using one of two techniques: either individual or entire device replacement. Costs were determined by including actual institutional costs. Model assumptions were based on a summary of published literature and were created based on a time horizon of 0-5 years since the original, primary AUS was placed, and models were created for malfunction of each individual component. Sensitivity analysis was done adjusting for costs of the device and failure rates. ResultsTotal costs to replace an individual component were $8330 for the pump, $7611 for the cuff, and $5599 for the balloon, while entire device replacement cost $15069. Over a 5-year time horizon the cost per patient for replacement of a balloon, pump, or cuff were $14407, $17491, and $15212, respectively, versus $18001 if the entire device was replaced. To be less costly to replace the entire device, balloon, pump, and cuff failure rates would need to be >55%, >25%, or >37.5% during the first 2 years after placement. ConclusionIn the event of failure of the artificial urinary sphincter, cost analysis demonstrates that removal and replacement of the entire device is more expensive than replacement of a malfunctioning component at any point up to 5 years after initial AUS placement.
引用
收藏
页码:1931 / 1936
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Ohmmeter Identifies the Site of Fluid Leakage during Artificial Urinary Sphincter Revision Surgery
    Selph, John Patrick
    Belsante, Michael James
    Gupta, Shubham
    Ajay, Divya
    Lentz, Aaron
    Webster, George
    Le, Ngoc-Bich P.
    Peterson, Andrew C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (04) : 1043 - 1048
  • [2] Artificial Urinary Sphincter Mechanical Failures-Is it Better to Replace the Entire Device or Just the Malfunctioning Component?
    Linder, Brian J.
    Viers, Boyd R.
    Ziegelmann, Matthew J.
    Rivera, Marcelino E.
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Elliott, Daniel S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (05) : 1523 - 1528
  • [3] Outcomes and Risk Factors of Revision and Replacement Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation in Radiated and Nonradiated Cases
    Fuller, Thomas W.
    Ballon-Landa, Eric
    Gallo, Kelsey
    Smith, Thomas G., III
    Ajay, Divya
    Westney, Ouida L.
    Elliott, Sean P.
    Alsikafi, Nejd F.
    Breyer, Benjamin N.
    Cohen, Andrew J.
    Vanni, Alex J.
    Broghammer, Joshua A.
    Erickson, Brad A.
    Myers, Jeremy B.
    Voelzke, Bryan B.
    Zhao, Lee C.
    Buckley, Jill C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (01) : 110 - 114
  • [4] Surgical strategies in artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery: troubleshooting the complications
    Averbeck, Marcio Augusto
    de Almeida, Silvio Henrique Maia
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2024, 13 (08) : 18 - 18
  • [5] Treatment strategies for revision surgery of artificial urinary sphincter: A review
    Kaiho, Yasuhiro
    Oikawa, Masaaki
    Kusumoto, Hiroki
    Kukimoto, Takashi
    Morozumi, Kento
    Ito, Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, : 1312 - 1320
  • [6] Decreasing Need for Artificial Urinary Sphincter Revision Surgery by Precise Cuff Sizing in Men with Spongiosal Atrophy
    Simhan, Jay
    Morey, Allen F.
    Zhao, Lee C.
    Tausch, Timothy J.
    Scott, J. Francis
    Hudak, Steven J.
    Mazzarella, Brian C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (03) : 798 - 803
  • [7] Impact of 3.5 cm Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff on Primary and Revision Surgery for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence
    Hudak, Steven J.
    Morey, Allen F.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (05) : 1962 - 1966
  • [8] Perioperative outcomes between primary and replacement artificial urinary sphincter surgery: An ACS-NSQIP analysis
    Jella, Tarun
    Fernstrum, Austin
    Callegari, Michael
    Cwalina, Tom
    Mundey, Wade
    Mahran, Amr
    Petrinic, Benjamin
    Ray, Al
    Elghalban, Heba
    Abdelrazek, Mostafa
    Loeb, Aram
    Thirumavalavan, Nannan
    Gupta, Shubham
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 47 (05): : 427 - 435
  • [9] Outcomes of Urethroplasty to Treat Urethral Strictures Arising From Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosions and Rates of Subsequent Device Replacement
    Keihani, Sorena
    Chandrapal, Jason C.
    Peterson, Andrew C.
    Broghammer, Joshua A.
    Chertack, Nathan
    Elliott, Sean P.
    Rourke, Keith F.
    Alsikafi, Nejd F.
    Buckley, Jill C.
    Breyer, Benjamin N.
    Smith, Thomas G., III
    Voelzke, Bryan B.
    Zhao, Lee C.
    Brant, William O.
    Myers, Jeremy B.
    UROLOGY, 2017, 107 : 239 - 244
  • [10] Causes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Failure and Strategies for Surgical Revision: Implications of Device Component Survival
    Srivastava, Arnav
    Joice, Gregory A.
    Patel, Hiten D.
    Manka, Madeleine G.
    Sopko, Nikolai A.
    Wright, E. James
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2019, 5 (05): : 887 - 893