Group regulation and social-emotional interactions observed in computer supported collaborative learning: Comparison between good vs. poor collaborators

被引:186
作者
Kwon, Kyungbin [1 ]
Liu, Ying-Hsiu [2 ]
Johnson, LaShaune P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[3] Creighton Univ, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
关键词
Computer-mediated communication; Collaborative learning; Teaching/learning strategies; Distributed learning environments; MOTIVATION LOSSES; COORDINATION; SATISFACTION; KNOWLEDGE; SENSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.004
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study explored what social interactions students exhibited during collaborative learning, and analyzed how the social interactions evolved in a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Six groups (n = 28) from an undergraduate online course were observed during a semester. Students' interactions were analyzed in two perspectives: group regulation and socioemotional. Cluster analysis was conducted to identify collaboration patterns of the groups. The analysis identified three collaborator clusters: one good and two poor. The good collaborators (named Early Active Collaborator) demonstrated: (1) intensive interactions among group members in the early collaboration phase, (2) positive socio-emotional interactions continuously, and (3) adaptive selections of group regulatory behaviors. The others showed dormant interactions throughout the projects and least socio-emotional interactions (named Passive Task-oriented Collaborator) and did not coordinate group process in a timely manner (named Late Collaborator). Comparisons of the interaction pattern and instructor intervention were discussed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 200
页数:16
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CROSS QUAL CHASM NEW
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Trust: human nature and the reconstitution of social order
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, J ASYNCHRONOUS LEARN, DOI [DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199610)47:10<797::AID-ASI20>3.0.00
[4]  
2-U, DOI 10.24059/OLJ.V2I1.1928]
[5]   When smart groups fail [J].
Barron, B .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2003, 12 (03) :307-359
[6]   Tacit guidance for collaborative multimedia learning [J].
Bodemer, Daniel .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 27 (03) :1079-1086
[7]   Type of positive interdependence and affiliation motive in an asynchronous, collaborative learning environment [J].
Brewer, Susan ;
Klein, James D. .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 54 (04) :331-354
[8]   Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds [J].
Bulu, Saniye Tugba .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2012, 58 (01) :154-161
[9]   Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide [J].
Chi, MTH .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 1997, 6 (03) :271-315
[10]   RESTRUCTURING THE CLASSROOM - CONDITIONS FOR PRODUCTIVE SMALL-GROUPS [J].
COHEN, EG .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1994, 64 (01) :1-35