An EC-Earth coupled atmosphere-ocean single-column model (AOSCM.v1_EC-Earth3) for studying coupled marine and polar processes

被引:11
作者
Hartung, Kerstin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Syensson, Gunilla [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Struthers, Hamish [4 ,5 ]
Deppenmeier, Anna-Lena [6 ,7 ]
Hazeleger, Wilco [6 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Dept Meteorol, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Bolin Ctr Climate Res, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Swedish E Sci Res Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] NSC, Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Linkoping Univ, Linkoping, Sweden
[6] Wageningen Univ, Meteorol & Air Qual Dept, Wageningen, Netherlands
[7] Royal Netherlands Meteorol Inst KNMI, R&D Weather & Climate Modeling, De Bilt, Netherlands
[8] Netherlands eSci Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS; BOUNDARY-LAYER; SEA-ICE; DIURNAL CYCLE; CLOUD; ATLANTIC; SENSITIVITY; CLIMATE; BIASES; TESTS;
D O I
10.5194/gmd-11-4117-2018
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Single-column models (SCMs) have been used as tools to help develop numerical weather prediction and global climate models for several decades. SCMs decouple small-scale processes from large-scale forcing, which allows the testing of physical parameterisations in a controlled environment with reduced computational cost. Typically, either the ocean, sea ice or atmosphere is fully modelled and assumptions have to be made regarding the boundary conditions from other subsystems, adding a potential source of error. Here, we present a fully coupled atmosphere-ocean SCM (AOSCM), which is based on the global climate model EC-Earth3. The initial configuration of the AOSCM consists of the Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean (NEMO3.6) (ocean), the Louvain-la-Neuve Sea Ice Model (LIM3) (sea ice), the Open Integrated Forecasting System (OpenIFS) cycle 40r1 (atmosphere), and OASIS3-MCT (coupler). Results from the AOSCM are presented at three locations: the tropical Atlantic, the midlatitude Pacific and the Arctic. At all three locations, in situ observations are available for comparison. We find that the coupled AOSCM can capture the observed atmospheric and oceanic evolution based on comparisons with buoy data, soundings and ship-based observations. The model evolution is sensitive to the initial conditions and forcing data imposed on the column. Comparing coupled and uncoupled configurations of the model can help disentangle model feedbacks. We demonstrate that the AOSCM in the current set-up is a valuable tool to advance our understanding in marine and polar boundary layer processes and the interactions between the individual components of the system (atmosphere, sea ice and ocean).
引用
收藏
页码:4117 / 4137
页数:21
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   How to design single-column model experiments for comparison with observed nocturnal low-level jets [J].
Baas, P. ;
Bosveld, F. C. ;
Lenderink, G. ;
van Meijgaard, E. ;
Holtslag, A. A. M. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 136 (648) :671-684
[2]   Evaluation of the ECMWF ocean reanalysis system ORAS4 [J].
Balmaseda, Magdalena Alonso ;
Mogensen, Kristian ;
Weaver, Anthony T. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 139 (674) :1132-1161
[3]   A Revised Hydrology for the ECMWF Model: Verification from Field Site to Terrestrial Water Storage and Impact in the Integrated Forecast System [J].
Balsamo, Gianpaolo ;
Viterbo, Pedro ;
Beljaars, Anton ;
van den Hurk, Bart ;
Hirschi, Martin ;
Betts, Alan K. ;
Scipal, Klaus .
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2009, 10 (03) :623-643
[4]   An inconvenient "truth" about using sensible heat flux as a surface boundary condition in models under stably stratified regimes [J].
Basu, Sukanta ;
Holtslag, Albert A. M. ;
Van De Wiel, Bas J. H. ;
Moene, Arnold F. ;
Steeneveld, Gert-Jan .
ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2008, 56 (01) :88-99
[5]   An intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of the stable boundary layer [J].
Beare, RJ ;
MacVean, MK ;
Holtslag, AAM ;
Cuxart, J ;
Esau, I ;
Golaz, JC ;
Jimenez, MA ;
Khairoutdinov, M ;
Kosovic, B ;
Lewellen, D ;
Lund, TS ;
Lundquist, JK ;
McCabe, A ;
Moene, AF ;
Noh, Y ;
Raasch, S ;
Sullivan, P .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2006, 118 (02) :247-272
[6]   A GCSS model intercomparison for a tropical squall line observed during TOGA-COARE. II: Intercomparison of single-column models and a cloud-resolving model [J].
Bechtold, P ;
Redelsperger, JL ;
Beau, I ;
Blackburn, M ;
Brinkop, S ;
Grandpeix, JY ;
Grant, A ;
Gregory, D ;
Guichard, F ;
Hoff, C ;
Ioannidou, E .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 126 (564) :865-888
[7]  
BETTS AK, 1986, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V112, P693, DOI 10.1256/smsqj.47307
[8]   The Third GABLS Intercomparison Case for Evaluation Studies of Boundary-Layer Models. Part A: Case Selection and Set-Up [J].
Bosveld, Fred C. ;
Baas, Peter ;
van Meijgaard, Erik ;
de Bruijn, Evert I. F. ;
Steeneveld, Gert-Jan ;
Holtslag, Albert A. M. .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2014, 152 (02) :133-156
[9]   HIGH-LATITUDE OCEAN AND SEA ICE SURFACE FLUXES: CHALLENGES FOR CLIMATE RESEARCH [J].
Bourassa, Mark A. ;
Gille, Sarah T. ;
Bitz, Cecilia ;
Carlson, David ;
Cerovecki, Ivana ;
Clayson, Carol Anne ;
Cronin, Meghan F. ;
Drennan, Will M. ;
Fairall, Chris W. ;
Hoffman, Ross N. ;
Magnusdottir, Gudrun ;
Pinker, Rachel T. ;
Renfrew, Ian A. ;
Serreze, Mark ;
Speer, Kevin ;
Talley, Lynne D. ;
Wick, Gary A. .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 94 (03) :403-423
[10]  
Bourles B, 2008, B AM METEOROL SOC, V89, P1111, DOI 10.1175/2008BAMS2462.1