Outcome Assessment in Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Trials and Prognostic Studies

被引:10
作者
Sherer, Mark [1 ]
Roebuck-Spencer, Tresa [2 ]
Davis, Lynne Cole [1 ]
机构
[1] TIRR Mem Hermann, Brain Injury Res Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
assessment; outcome; research; TBI; traumatic brain injury; LONG-TERM DISABILITY; COMMUNITY INTEGRATION; UNITED-STATES; REHABILITATION; IMPACT; RACE/ETHNICITY; PRODUCTIVITY; CONCORDANCE; POPULATION; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181c9d887
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Large numbers of investigations have sought to evaluate prediction of outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the effectiveness of interventions designed to address post-TBI deficits. Unfortunately, failure to attend to key issues in experimental design regarding outcome assessment has limited the utility of these investigations. Increased attention to 5 issues in outcome assessment will increase the evidence base for TBI prognosis and treatment and increase the relevance of findings to end users of research such as other investigators, rehabilitation providers, policy makers, persons with TBI, and family members of persons with TBI. These 5 issues are (1) masking of outcome examiners, (2) retention of study participants, (3) use of surrogate informants to capture data from a wider range of study participants, (4) relevance of study outcomes to stakeholders, and (5) cultural considerations in outcome assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 98
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, INCIDENCE EC BURDEN, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195179484.001.0001
  • [2] Relationship between neuropsychological test performance and productivity at 1-year following traumatic brain injury
    Atchison, TB
    Sander, AM
    Struchen, MA
    High, WM
    Roebuck, TM
    Contant, CF
    Wefel, JS
    Novack, TA
    Sherer, M
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2004, 18 (02) : 249 - 265
  • [3] Ethics, values, and world culture: The impact on rehabilitation
    Banja, JD
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 1996, 18 (06) : 279 - 284
  • [4] Supervision rating scale: A measure of functional outcome from brain injury
    Boake, C
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1996, 77 (08): : 765 - 772
  • [5] Clinical elements that predict outcome after traumatic brain injury: A prospective multicenter recursive partitioning (decision-tree) analysis
    Brown, AW
    Malec, JF
    McClelland, RL
    Diehl, NN
    Englander, J
    Cifu, DX
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2005, 22 (10) : 1040 - 1051
  • [6] TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY IN FAMILIES FROM CULTURALLY DIVERSE POPULATIONS
    CAVALLO, MM
    SAUCEDO, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 1995, 10 (02) : 66 - 77
  • [7] Systematic bias in traumatic brain injury outcome studies because of loss to follow-up
    Corrigan, JD
    Harrison-Felix, C
    Bogner, J
    Dijkers, M
    Terrill, MS
    Whiteneck, G
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 84 (02): : 153 - 160
  • [8] Community integration status 4 years after traumatic brain injury - Participant-proxy agreement
    Dawson, DR
    Markowitz, M
    Stuss, DT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2005, 20 (05) : 426 - 435
  • [9] Edlund W., 2004, Clinical Practice Guideline process manual
  • [10] The measurement and magnitude of awareness difficulties after traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal study
    Farrell Pagulayan, Kathleen
    Temkin, Nancy R.
    Machamer, Joan E.
    Dikmen, Sureyya S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 13 (04) : 561 - 570