Exposure to Low Amounts of Ultrasound Energy Does Not Improve Soft Tissue Shoulder Pathology: A Systematic Review

被引:40
作者
Alexander, Lisa D. [2 ]
Gilman, David R. D. [3 ]
Brown, Derek R. [4 ]
Brown, Janet L. [5 ]
Houghton, Pamela E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Sch Phys Therapy, Elborn Coll, London, ON N6G 1H1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[3] Grand River Physiotherapy, Fergus, ON, Canada
[4] Rehab Hlth Inc, Brantford Gen Hosp, Brantford, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Western Ontario, Sch Phys Therapy, London, ON, Canada
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2010年 / 90卷 / 01期
关键词
MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS; THERAPEUTIC ULTRASOUND; DOUBLE-BLIND; PULSED ULTRASOUND; PAIN; PHYSIOTHERAPY; TENDON; MANIFESTATIONS; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.2522/ptj.20080272
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Although therapeutic ultrasound is commonly used to treat shoulder injuries, research to date on the ability of ultrasound to improve outcomes for shoulder pathologies is conflicting. Objective. This study aimed to systematically and critically review available literature to ascertain whether beneficial effects of Ultrasound were associated with certain shoulder pathologies or particular ultrasound treatment protocols. Methods. Five electronic databases were searched, and the included studies, identified through pair consensus, were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that Utilized ultrasound for soft tissue shoulder injury or pain. Study Selection and Data Extraction. Eight studies included in this review (n=586 patients, median PEDro score=8.0/10) evaluated various parameters, including the duration of patients' symptoms (0-12 months), duty cycle (20% and 100%), intensity (0.1-2.0 W/cm(2)), treatment time per session (4.5-15.8 minutes), number of treatments (6-39), and total energy applied per treatment (181-8,152 J). Data Synthesis. inconsistent Outcome measures among studies precluded meta-analysis; however, 3 RCTs showed statistically significant benefits Of ultrasound, 2 of which examined calcific tendinitis. Studies that showed beneficial effects of ultrasound typically had 4 times longer total exposure times and applied much greater ultrasound energy per session (average of 4,228 J) compared with Studies that showed no benefit of ultrasound (average of 2,019 J). No studies that delivered <= 720 J per session showed improvement in treatment groups. Limitations. Current research involving ultrasound treatment protocols that delivered low levels Of Ultrasound energy do not adequately address whether ultrasound can improve outcomes for shoulder disorders. Conclusion. Determining whether therapeutic ultrasound call affect Soft tissue Shoulder pathologies will require further research and systematic reviews that involve appropriate ultrasound treatment protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 25
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] A prospective double blind placebo-controlled randomized trial of ultrasound in the physiotherapy treatment of shoulder pain
    Ainsworth, R.
    Dziedzic, K.
    Hiller, L.
    Daniels, J.
    Bruton, A.
    Broadfield, J.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (05) : 815 - 820
  • [2] Albright J, 2001, PHYS THER, V81, P1719
  • [3] PREVALENCE, INCIDENCE, AND REMISSION RATES OF SOME COMMON RHEUMATIC DISEASES OR SYNDROMES
    ALLANDER, E
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1974, 3 (03) : 145 - 153
  • [4] Untitled
    Amusat, Nurudeen T.
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2007, 87 (11): : 1558 - 1559
  • [5] BRIDGESWEBB CH, 1992, MED J AUST S, V156, pS1
  • [6] Physiotherapy for soft tissue shoulder disorders - Conclusion that therapeutic ultrasound is ineffective was based on weak evidence
    Brockow, T
    Franke, A
    Resch, KL
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7130) : 555 - 555
  • [7] BROCKOW T, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V316, P556
  • [8] Shoulder pain
    Brox, JI
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 17 (01): : 33 - 56
  • [9] Burbank KM, 2008, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V77, P493
  • [10] Burbank KM, 2008, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V77, P453