Nomograms for predicting survival in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who undergo palliative gastrectomy

被引:12
作者
Ma, Tai [1 ]
Wu, Zhi-jun [1 ]
Xu, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Chang-hao [3 ]
Xu, Jing [1 ]
Peng, Wan-ren [1 ]
Fan, Lu-lu [1 ]
Sun, Guo-ping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Oncol, 218 Jixi Rd, Hefei 230022, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Inst Canc Prevent & Control, 218 Jixi Rd, Hefei 230022, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Surrey, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Guildford, Surrey, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gastric adenocarcinoma; Palliative gastrectomy; Nomogram; Prognosis; PRIMARY TUMOR; SURGICAL RESECTION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-019-6075-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Recently, evidence has emerged that palliative gastrectomy in patients with stage IV gastric cancer may offer some survival benefits. However, the decision whether to perform primary tumor surgery remains challenging for surgeons, and investigations into models that are predictive of prognosis are scarce. Current study aimed to develop and validate prognostic nomograms for patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma treated with palliative gastrectomy. Methods The development dataset comprised 1186 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program who were diagnosed with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma in 2004-2011, while the validation dataset included 407 patients diagnosed in 2012-2015. Variables were incorporated into a Cox proportional hazards model to identify independent risk factors for survival. Both pre- and postoperative nomograms for predicting 1- or 2-year survival probabilities were constructed using the development dataset. The concordance index (c-index) and calibration curves were plotted to determine the accuracy of the nomogram models. Finally, the cut-off value of the calculated total scores based on preoperative nomograms was set and validated by comparing survival with contemporary cases without primary tumor surgery. Results Age, tumor size, location, grade, T stage, N stage, metastatic site, scope of gastrectomy, number of examined lymph node(s), chemotherapy and radiotherapy were risk factors of survival and were included as variables in the postoperative nomogram; the c-indices of the development and validation datasets were 0.701 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.693-0.710) and 0.699 (95% CI: 0.682-0.716), respectively. The preoperative nomogram incorporated age, tumor size, location, grade, depth of invasion, regional lymph node(s) status, and metastatic site. The c-indices for the internal (bootstrap) and external validation sets were 0.629 (95% CI: 0.620-0.639) and 0.607 (95% CI: 0.588-0.626), respectively. Based on the preoperative nomogram, patients with preoperative total score > 28 showed no survival benefit with gastrectomy compared to no primary tumor surgery. Conclusions Our survival nomograms for patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma undergoing palliative gastrectomy can assist surgeons in treatment decision-making and prognostication.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Ahmed Shahid, 2015, Clin Colorectal Cancer, V14, pe41, DOI 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.05.008
[2]   Survival Impact of Surgical Resection of Primary Tumor in Patients With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer [J].
Ahmed, Shahid ;
Leis, Anne ;
Fields, Anthony ;
Chandra-Kanthan, Selliah ;
Haider, Kamal ;
Alvi, Riaz ;
Reeder, Bruce ;
Pahwa, Punam .
CANCER, 2014, 120 (05) :683-691
[3]   X-tile: A new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization [J].
Camp, RL ;
Dolled-Filhart, M ;
Rimm, DL .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 10 (21) :7252-7259
[4]   The Value of Palliative Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer with Distant Metastasis [J].
Chang, Ye Rim ;
Han, Dong Seok ;
Kong, Seong-Ho ;
Lee, Hyuk-Joon ;
Kim, Se Hyung ;
Kim, Woo Ho ;
Yang, Han-Kwang .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (04) :1231-1239
[5]   Palliative Gastrectomy Prolongs Survival of Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients with Normal Preoperative CEA or CA19-9 Values: A Retrospective Cohort Study [J].
Chiu, Chang-Fang ;
Yang, Horng-Ren ;
Yang, Mei-Due ;
Jeng, Long-Bin ;
Yang, Tse-Yen ;
Sargeant, Aaron M. ;
Bai, Li-Yuan .
GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 2016
[6]   Surgical removal of primary tumor reverses tumor-induced immunosuppression despite the presence of metastatic disease [J].
Danna, EA ;
Sinha, P ;
Gilbert, M ;
Clements, VK ;
Pulaski, BA ;
Ostrand-Rosenberg, S .
CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 64 (06) :2205-2211
[7]   Gastrectomy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer with a single non-curable factor (REGATTA): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial [J].
Fujitani, Kazumasa ;
Yang, Han-Kwang ;
Mizusawa, Junki ;
Kim, Young-Woo ;
Terashima, Masanori ;
Han, Sang-Uk ;
Iwasaki, Yoshiaki ;
Hyung, Woo Jin ;
Takagane, Akinori ;
Park, Do Joong ;
Yoshikawa, Takaki ;
Hahn, Seokyung ;
Nakamura, Kenichi ;
Park, Cho Hyun ;
Kurokawa, Yukinori ;
Bang, Yung-Jue ;
Park, Byung Joo ;
Sasako, Mitsuru ;
Tsujinaka, Toshimasa .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (03) :309-318
[8]   Real-world evidence in metastatic renal cell carcinoma [J].
Graham, Jeffrey ;
Heng, Daniel Y. C. .
TUMORI JOURNAL, 2018, 104 (02) :76-82
[9]   Meta-Analysis to Determine if Surgical Resection of the Primary Tumour in the Setting of Stage IV Breast Cancer Impacts on Survival [J].
Harris, Elly ;
Barry, Mitchel ;
Kell, Malcolm R. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (09) :2828-2834
[10]   Survival benefits of gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients with stage IV: a population-based study [J].
He, Xingkang ;
Lai, Sanchuan ;
Su, Tingting ;
Liu, Yangyang ;
Ding, Yue ;
Quan, Sheng ;
Si, Jianmin ;
Sun, Leimin .
ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (63) :106577-106586