Intraspecific competition and fungal diseases as sources of variation in sunflower yield

被引:18
作者
Sadras, VO
Trápani, N
Pereyra, VR
Pereira, ML
Quiroz, F
Mortarini, M
机构
[1] Univ Mar del Plata, INTA Balcarce, RA-7620 Balcarce, Argentina
[2] Univ Buenos Aires, RA-1417 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
biotic stress; breeding; genetic improvement; Verticillium dahliae; Sclerotinia sclerotiorum; Helianthus annuus; competition; yield potential;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00083-6
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
We propose that sunflower yield is negatively associated with responsiveness to intraspecific competition but that this relationship can be affected by fungal diseases. This hypothesis was tested in environments when Sclerotinia head rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary) and Verticillium wilt (Verticillium dahliae Klebahn) were the prevalent diseases. Comparisons included cultivars released to the market in the last four decades (Experiments 1 and 2), and current hybrids of varying yield potential (Experiments 3 and 4). In each experiment, yield of undisturbed controls was compared with that achieved by reducing inter-row competition. Yield increase in response to reduced competition ranged from 0 to 84%, highlighting the variation among cultivars. In Experiments 1 and 3, the percentage of leaves with symptoms of Verticillium wilt accounted for 28-32% of the variation in control plot yield, while response to competition accounted for 60-75% of the residual variation; a negative association between control plot yield and response to competition was shown. In Experiments 2 and 4, incidence of head rot accounted for most of the variation in yield among cultivars. The lack of association between yield and response to competition in crops with head rot, and the negative relationship between yield and response to competition in crops with Verticillium wilt was consistent with our working hypothesis. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 58
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   WHAT SELECTION - HERBIVORY OR COMPETITION [J].
AARSSEN, LW ;
IRWIN, DL .
OIKOS, 1991, 60 (02) :261-262
[2]   PLANT PHOTOMORPHOGENESIS IN CANOPIES, CROP GROWTH, AND YIELD [J].
BALLARE, CL ;
SCOPEL, AL ;
SANCHEZ, RA .
HORTSCIENCE, 1995, 30 (06) :1172-1181
[3]   PLANT COMPETITION AND HERBIVORY IN RELATION TO VEGETATION BIOMASS [J].
BONSER, SP ;
READER, RJ .
ECOLOGY, 1995, 76 (07) :2176-2183
[4]   PLANT-RESPONSES TO MULTIPLE ENVIRONMENTAL-FACTORS [J].
CHAPIN, FS ;
BLOOM, AJ ;
FIELD, CB ;
WARING, RH .
BIOSCIENCE, 1987, 37 (01) :49-57
[5]  
Donald C. M., 1981, Wheat science - today and tomorrow., P223
[6]   BREEDING OF CROP IDEOTYPES [J].
DONALD, CM .
EUPHYTICA, 1968, 17 (03) :385-+
[7]   THE CONVERGENT EVOLUTION OF ANNUAL SEED CROPS IN AGRICULTURE [J].
DONALD, CM ;
HAMBLIN, J .
ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, 1983, 36 :97-143
[8]  
Evans L.T., 1993, CROP EVOLUTION ADAPT
[9]   Plant compensatory growth: Herbivory or competition? [J].
Jaremo, J ;
Nilsson, P ;
Tuomi, J .
OIKOS, 1996, 77 (02) :238-247
[10]  
Maynard Smith J., 1982, pi