Examining Differential Effects of a Family Literacy Program on Language and Literacy Growth of English Language Learners With Varying Vocabularies

被引:9
作者
O'Brien, Lisa M. [1 ]
Paratore, Jeanne R. [2 ,3 ]
Leighton, Christine M. [5 ]
Cassano, Christina M. [6 ]
Krol-Sinclair, Barbara [7 ]
Green, Jennifer Greif [4 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Reading Educ Program, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Literacy Educ Program, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Boston Univ, Sch Educ, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Emmanuel Coll, Boston, MA USA
[6] Salem State Univ, Salem, MA 01970 USA
[7] Chelsea Publ Sch, Chelsea, MA USA
关键词
Family Literacy; English Language Learners; Vocabulary; READING-COMPREHENSION; CHILDREN; ACQUISITION; KINDERGARTEN; INTERVENTION; ABILITY; WORDS;
D O I
10.1177/1086296X14552180
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Many English language learners (ELLs) and children living in poverty begin school with substantially less English vocabulary knowledge than their monolingual, economically advantaged peers. Without effective intervention, these vocabulary gaps are likely to contribute to long-term reading failure. This quasi-experimental study examined the extent to which a family literacy program (FLP) moderated vocabulary development of 158 ELLs (prekindergarten through third grade) from low-income families in relation to children's level of vocabulary knowledge (at, moderately below, or substantially below national norms) on program entry. The FLP activities focused on supporting parents' development of English literacy and on teaching them effective ways to engage their children in authentic, home-based literacy events and practices that could be expected to prepare their children for success in school. Findings indicated that although all children demonstrated substantial language and literacy growth, children with the lowest pretest vocabulary knowledge achieved the greatest vocabulary gains and these gains differed significantly from their demographically matched peers who did not participate in the FLP. Gains for treatment and control children with middle and high pretest vocabulary knowledge (relative to this sample) did not differ significantly. Findings suggest that an FLP emphasizing authentic literacy practices holds particular promise in closing vocabulary gaps among children who enter early childhood classrooms with especially limited English vocabulary knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 415
页数:33
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Adams M.J., 1990, BEGINNING READ THINK
[2]  
Addy S., 2013, Basic facts about low-income children, children under 18 years
[3]  
Alexander Patricia., 2000, HDB READING RES, V3, P285
[4]  
Anderson J., 2010, IMPLEMENTING INTERGE
[5]  
Anderson R.C., 1981, COMPREHENSION TEACHI, P77, DOI DOI 10.4236/PSYCH.2012.31007
[6]   GROWTH IN READING AND HOW CHILDREN SPEND THEIR TIME OUTSIDE OF SCHOOL [J].
ANDERSON, RC ;
WILSON, PT ;
FIELDING, LG .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1988, 23 (03) :285-303
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, WHAT RES HAS SAY REA, DOI DOI 10.1598/0829.03
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2001, MISSING DATA
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, DEVELOPING LITERACY
[10]  
August D., 2005, Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, V20, P50, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1540-5826.2005.00120.X