Impact of hospital volume on outcomes for laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction

被引:5
|
作者
Jean, Raymond A. [1 ,2 ]
O'Neill, Kathleen M. [2 ]
Pei, Kevin Y. [3 ]
Davis, Kimberly A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Natl Clin Scholars Program, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Dept Surg, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Sch Med, Sect Gen Surg Trauma & Surg Crit Care, Dept Surg, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions; Adhesiolysis; Minimally invasive surgery; Small bowel obstruction; SBO; Hospital volume; OPERATIVE MORTALITY; MANAGEMENT; PREDICTORS; SURGERY; LYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.045
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Volume-to-outcome data have been studied in several complex surgical procedures, demonstrating improved outcomes at higher volume centers. Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions (LLOA) for small bowel obstruction (SBO) may result in better outcomes, but there is no information on the learning curve for this potentially complex case. This study evaluates the effect of institutional procedural volume on length of stay (LOS), outcomes, and costs in LLOA for SBOs. Materials and methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample data set between 2000 and 2013 was queried for discharges for a diagnosis of SBO involving LLOA in adult patients. Patients with intra-abdominal malignancy and evidence of any other major surgical procedure during hospitalization were excluded. The procedural volume per hospital was calculated over the period, and high-volume hospitals were designated as those performing greater than five LLOA per year. Patient characteristics were described by hospital volume status using stratified cluster sampling tabulation and linear regression methods. LOS, total charges, and costs were reported as means with standard deviation and median values. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 9111 discharges were selected, which was representative of 43,567 weighted discharges nationally between 2000 and 2013. Over the study period, there has been a 450% increase in the number of LLOA performed. High-volume hospitals had significantly shorter LOS (mean: 4.92 +/- standard error (SE) 0.13 d; median: 3.6) compared to low-volume hospitals (mean: 5.68 +/- 0.06 d; median: 4.5). Inmultivariate analysis, high-volume status was associated with a decreased LOS of 0.72 d (P < 0.0001) as compared to low-volumestatus. Other significant predictors for decreased LOS included decreased age, decreased comorbidity, and the absence of small bowel resection. There was no significant association between volume status andtotal charges in multivariate or univariatemodels, but high-volume hospitals were associated with lower costs in multivariatemodels by approximately $984 (P - 0.017). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that high hospital volume was associated with decreased LOS for LLOA in SBO. Although volume was not associated with differences in total charges, there was a small decrease in hospital costs. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 31
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction
    Nagle, A
    Ujiki, M
    Denham, W
    Murayama, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 187 (04): : 464 - 470
  • [2] Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic adhesiolysis for mechanical small bowel obstruction
    Okamoto, H.
    Wakana, H.
    Kawashima, K.
    Fukasawa, T.
    Fujii, H.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2012, 5 (02) : 53 - 58
  • [3] Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for postoperative small bowel obstruction
    Hayashi, R.
    Hasegawa, H.
    Ishii, Y.
    Endo, T.
    Ochiai, H.
    Imai, S.
    Onouchi, S.
    Iida, S.
    Kitagawa, Y.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (05) : 715 - 715
  • [4] Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent postoperative small bowel obstruction
    Tsumura, H
    Ichikawa, T
    Murakami, Y
    Sueda, T
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 51 (58) : 1058 - 1061
  • [5] Laparoscopic adhesiolysis versus open adhesiolysis in acute adhesive small bowel obstruction
    Elkomos, Beshoy Effat
    Fahmy, Karim
    Kamel, Kareem Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2023, 19 (04) : 511 - 517
  • [6] Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for acute small bowel obstruction: systematic review and pooled analysis
    Wiggins, Tom
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Harris, Adrian
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (12): : 3432 - 3442
  • [7] Early laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction: retrospective study of main advantages
    Mazzetti, Claudia Hannele
    Serinaldi, Francesco
    Lebrun, Eric
    Lemaitre, Jean
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (06): : 2781 - 2792
  • [8] Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for acute small bowel obstruction: systematic review and pooled analysis
    Tom Wiggins
    Sheraz R. Markar
    Adrian Harris
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29 : 3432 - 3442
  • [9] Keys to successful laparoscopic adhesiolysis for adhesive small bowel obstruction: A scoping review
    Huang, Yuanqi
    Fu, Ruimin
    Liu, Dandan
    Wen, Kunming
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (14)