共 30 条
Robust fast maximum likelihood with assumed clutter covariance algorithm for adaptive clutter suppression
被引:3
作者:
Tang, Bo
[1
]
Zhang, Yu
[1
]
Tang, Jun
[2
]
机构:
[1] Inst Elect Engn, Lab 504, Hefei 230037, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
space-time adaptive processing;
computational complexity;
covariance matrices;
eigenvalues and eigenfunctions;
numerical analysis;
maximum likelihood estimation;
radar clutter;
pulsed Doppler radar;
performance enhancement;
numerical simulations;
parameter selection;
covariance matrix;
eigenvalue;
parameter selection methods;
maximum likelihood covariance matrix estimator;
power mismatch;
FMLACC algorithm;
interference covariance matrix;
noise power;
adaptive clutter suppression;
clutter covariance algorithm;
robust fast maximum likelihood;
MATRIX ESTIMATION;
KNOWLEDGE;
RADAR;
PERFORMANCE;
STAP;
D O I:
10.1049/iet-rsn.2014.0017
中图分类号:
TM [电工技术];
TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号:
0808 ;
0809 ;
摘要:
The mismatch between the clutter and noise power of the prior knowledge and true interference covariance matrix degrades the performance of fast maximum likelihood with assumed clutter covariance (FMLACC) algorithm significantly. By introducing a scale parameter to flexibly adjust the prior power, the authors propose an algorithm which is more robust to the power mismatch than FMLACC algorithm. They also develop a more straightforward method to derive the maximum likelihood covariance matrix estimator under this scaled knowledge constraint. Moreover, they study the problem of automatically determining the scale parameter. The authors provide two parameter selection methods, the first of which is based on estimating the minimum eigenvalue of the prewhitened sample covariance matrix, and the second is based on cross validation. To reduce the computational complexity, they also develop fast implementations for the parameter selection based on cross validation. Numerical simulations demonstrate the performance enhancement of the proposed algorithm compared with FMLACC algorithm in cases of mismatched prior knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:1184 / 1194
页数:11
相关论文