Amniotic fluid index and single deepest pocket: Weak indicators of abnormal amniotic volumes

被引:49
作者
Magann, EF [1 ]
Chauhan, SP
Barrilleaux, PS
Whitworh, NS
Martin, JN
机构
[1] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[2] Spartanburg Reg Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Spartanburg, SC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01020-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare amniotic fluid index (AFI) with the single deepest pocket in the identification of actual abnormal amniotic fluid (AF) volumes. Methods: One hundred seventy-nine women with singleton pregnancies at the University of Mississippi between March 1994 and June 1999 had ultrasound estimations of AF volume sequentially using the AFI and single deepest pocket techniques. Each woman subsequently had ultrasound-directed amniocentesis with dye-dilution and spectrophotomeiric calculation of actual AF volume. Results: Actual AF volumes were low (under 5% by volume for gestational age) in 62 women, normal (5-95%) in 100 women, and high (more than 95%) in 17 women. An AFI up to 5 cm (sensitivity 10%, specificity 96%) and a single deepest pocket up to 2 cm (sensitivity 5%, specificity 98%) were similarly inadequate in identifying dye-determined low AF volumes. Likewise, AFI above 20 (sensitivity 29%, specificity 97%) and a single-deepest pocket above 8 cm (sensitivity 29%, specificity 94%) were poor in identifying dye-determined abnormally high volumes. Conclusion: There was no difference between AFI and single deepest pocket techniques for identifying truly abnormal AF volumes. Both techniques were unreliable for identifying true AF volumes. (Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:737-40. (C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).
引用
收藏
页码:737 / 740
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   A randomised comparison between amniotic fluid index and maximum pool depth in the monitoring of post-term pregnancy [J].
Alfirevic, Z ;
Luckas, M ;
Walkinshaw, SA ;
McFarlane, M ;
Curran, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 (02) :207-211
[2]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 1994, ACOG TECHN B, V188
[3]   NORMAL AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUME CHANGES THROUGHOUT PREGNANCY [J].
BRACE, RA ;
WOLF, EJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 161 (02) :382-388
[4]   ULTRASOUND EVALUATION OF AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUME .1. THE RELATIONSHIP OF MARGINAL AND DECREASED AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUMES TO PERINATAL OUTCOME [J].
CHAMBERLAIN, PF ;
MANNING, FA ;
MORRISON, I ;
HARMAN, CR ;
LANGE, IR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1984, 150 (03) :245-249
[5]   PRELIMINARY DATA ON USE OF SODIUM AMINOHIPPURATE TO DETERMINE AMNIOTIC FLUID VOLUMES [J].
CHARLES, D ;
JACOBY, HE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1966, 95 (02) :266-&
[6]   A RANDOMIZED STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY OF THE AMNIOTIC-FLUID INDEX AS A FETAL ADMISSION [J].
CHAUHAN, SP ;
WASHBURNE, JF ;
MAGANN, EF ;
PERRY, KG ;
MARTIN, JN ;
MORRISON, JC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 86 (01) :9-13
[7]  
Conway D L, 1998, J Matern Fetal Med, V7, P197
[8]   DO SEMIQUANTITATIVE AMNIOTIC-FLUID INDEXES REFLECT ACTUAL VOLUME [J].
CROOM, CS ;
BANIAS, BB ;
RAMOSSANTOS, E ;
DEVOE, LD ;
BEZHADIAN, A ;
HIETT, AK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 167 (04) :995-999
[9]   AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUME ASSESSMENT - COMPARISON OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATES VERSUS DIRECT MEASUREMENTS WITH A DYE-DILUTION TECHNIQUE IN HUMAN-PREGNANCY [J].
DILDY, GA ;
LIRA, N ;
MOISE, KJ ;
RIDDLE, GD ;
DETER, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 167 (04) :986-994
[10]   CORRELATION OF MEASURED AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUME AND SONOGRAPHIC PREDICTIONS OF OLIGOHYDRAMNIOS [J].
HORSAGER, R ;
NATHAN, L ;
LEVENO, KJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 83 (06) :955-958