Increased detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia utilizing an optical detection system as an adjunct to colposcopy

被引:25
作者
Alvarez, Ronald D.
Wright, Thomas C., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] TriArc Consulting, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Arrowhead Reg Med Ctr, Colton, CA USA
[5] MediSpectra Inc, Lexington, MA USA
[6] Univ Arizona, Hlth Sci Ctr, Tucson, AZ USA
[7] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[8] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
spectroscopy; optical detection systerns; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; colposcopy; cervix;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.02.028
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the impact of using a novel optical detection system (ODS) as an adjunct to colposcopy. Methods. A multicenter internally controlled trial designed to evaluate the performance of an ODS system (LUMA MediSpectra, Lexington, MA) used as an adjunct to colposcopy among women referred for the evaluation of an abnormal cervical cytology result was conducted at 7 colposcopy clinics in the United States and enrolled 227 women. After exclusions, 193 women remained in the analysis. The main study outcomes were incremental increases in true positives (CIN 2,3 and cancer, or CIN 2+) and false positives (women with additional cervical biopsies not found to be CIN 2+). Results. Initial colposcopy identified 41 cases of CIN 2+ for a true positive (TP) rate of 21.2%. Adjunctive use of ODS identified an additional 9 cases of CIN 2+ which corresponds to an incremental ODS TP rate of 4.7% (95% CI 2.2% to 8.7%). Adjunctive use of ODS therefore resulted in a 22.0% (95% CI 6.1% to 37.8%) relative gain in the number of women with CTN2+ compared to colposcopy alone. The false positive (FP) rate for initial colposcopy was 51.8% (100 of 193 women). An additional 35 subjects had an ODS-directed biopsy that was not diagnosed as CIN 2+, yielding an incremental FP rate of 18.1% (95% CI 13.0% to 24.3%). Conclusions. Adjunctive use of ODS with colposcopy provides a significant increase in the detection of CIN 2+ in women referred for the evaluation of abnormal cytology results. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 28
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Effective cervical neoplasia detection with a novel optical detection system: A randomized trial [J].
Alvarez, Ronald D. ;
Wright, Thomas C. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 104 (02) :281-289
[2]   Shanxi province cervical cancer screening study: A cross-sectional comparative trial of multiple techniques to detect cervical neoplasia [J].
Belinson, J ;
Qiao, YL ;
Pretorius, R ;
Zhang, WH ;
Elson, P ;
Li, L ;
Pan, QJ ;
Fischer, C ;
Lorincz, A ;
Zahniser, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 83 (02) :439-444
[3]  
Brookner CK, 1999, LASER SURG MED, V24, P29, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1999)24:1<29::AID-LSM6>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-8
[5]   COLPOSCOPICALLY DIRECTED PUNCH BIOPSY - A POTENTIALLY MISLEADING INVESTIGATION [J].
BUXTON, EJ ;
LUESLEY, DM ;
SHAFI, MI ;
ROLLASON, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (12) :1273-1276
[6]   CERVICAL CYTOLOGIC ABNORMALITIES AND NEGATIVE COLPOSCOPY - HISTOLOGIC ASSESSMENT [J].
CHENOY, R ;
MANOHAR, S ;
REDMAN, CWE ;
LUESLEY, DM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 1994, 4 (05) :348-351
[7]  
Davey DD, 2004, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V128, P1224
[8]   Optical imaging of the cervix [J].
Drezek, RA ;
Richards-Kortum, R ;
Brewer, MA ;
Feld, MS ;
Pitris, C ;
Ferenczy, A ;
Faupel, ML ;
Follen, M .
CANCER, 2003, 98 (09) :2015-2027
[9]  
Ferris D G, 2001, J Low Genit Tract Dis, V5, P65, DOI 10.1097/00128360-200104000-00001
[10]   Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy [J].
Gage, Julia C. ;
Hanson, Vivien W. ;
Abbey, Kim ;
Dippery, Susan ;
Gardner, Susi ;
Kubota, Janet ;
Schiffman, Mark ;
Solomon, Diane ;
Jeronimo, Jose .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (02) :264-272