Discriminative Value of Tender Points in Fibromyalgia Syndrome

被引:25
作者
Tastekin, Nurettin [2 ]
Uzunca, Kaan [2 ]
Sut, Necdet [1 ]
Birtane, Murat [2 ]
Mercimek, Oznur Berke [2 ]
机构
[1] Trakya Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat, Edirne, Turkey
[2] Trakya Univ, Fac Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Edirne, Turkey
关键词
Fibromyalgia; Chronic Pain; Tender Points; Dolorimeter; Pain Assessment and Methods; PAIN; RELIABILITY; DIAGNOSIS; THRESHOLD; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00784.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective. The aim of this study is to assess the discriminative value of all tender points, alone and in combination, that are designated as criteria for fibromyalgia diagnosis by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), by investigating the appropriate pressure magnitude that should be applied during tenderness examination. Design. Cross-sectional. Patients. This study was performed on 66 patients with fibromyalgia diagnosed according to ACR classification criteria and 50 control subjects. Setting. The outpatient rheumatology clinic of a PM&R department of a university hospital. Intervention. Pressure pain threshold values were measured by a dolorimeter on nine specific point pairs in both groups and a cutoff value for discriminating positivity and negativity was calculated for each. Then the most valuable tender point pairs were assessed for discrimination of fibromyalgia syndrome using ACR criteria set as a reference standard. Results. All tender points with determined pressure cutoff values were found out to significantly discriminate fibromyalgia syndrome and their area under curve values ranged from 0.779 to 0.934. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that lateral epicondyle and supraspinatus point pairs had the most powerful discriminative ability (odds ratio = 113.6 and 45.0, respectively). Multiple logistic regression analysis with backward stepwise method showed that lateral epicondyle and second rib point pairs were most discriminative with sensitivity and specificity rates of 87.9-94.0% and 77.3-84.0%, respectively. Conclusions. Fibromyalgia syndrome can have potential to be recognized simply by pressing fewer tender point areas but with various pressure cutoff levels identified for each tender point areas.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 471
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   POPULATION STUDY OF TENDER POINT COUNTS AND PAIN AS EVIDENCE OF FIBROMYALGIA [J].
CROFT, P ;
SCHOLLUM, J ;
SILMAN, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6956) :696-699
[3]   Inaccuracy in the diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome: analysis of referrals [J].
Fitzcharles, MA ;
Boulos, P .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 42 (02) :263-267
[4]   Evoked pain measures in fibromyalgia [J].
Gracely, RH ;
Grant, MAB ;
Giesecke, T .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 17 (04) :593-609
[5]   A critical analysis of the tender points in fibromyalgia [J].
Harden, R. Norman ;
Revivo, Gadi ;
Song, Sharon ;
Nampiaparampil, Devi ;
Golden, Gary ;
Kirincic, Marie ;
Houle, Timothy T. .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2007, 8 (02) :147-156
[6]   Fibromyalgia diagnosis - A comparison of clinical, survey, and American College of Rheumatology criteria [J].
Katz, RS ;
Wolfe, F ;
Michaud, K .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2006, 54 (01) :169-176
[7]   Quantifying pain threshold and quality of life of fibromyalgia patients [J].
Marques, AP ;
Ferreira, EAG ;
Matsutani, LA ;
Pereira, CAB ;
Assumpçao, A .
CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2005, 24 (03) :266-271
[8]  
McBeth J, 2001, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V44, P940, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200104)44:4<940::AID-ANR151>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-S
[10]   Tender point count and total myalgic score in fibromyalgia: changes over a 28-day period [J].
McVeigh, J. G. ;
Finch, M. B. ;
Hurley, D. A. ;
Basford, J. R. ;
Sim, J. ;
Baxter, G. D. .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 27 (11) :1011-1018