The Development of an Accurate Test Weighing Technique for Preterm and High-Risk Hospitalized Infants

被引:36
作者
Haase, Barbara [1 ]
Barreira, Jeanne [1 ]
Murphy, Pamela K. [1 ]
Mueller, Martina [1 ]
Rhodes, Jean [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Lactat Consultat Serv, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
CLINICAL MEASUREMENT; ASSESSING AGREEMENT; MILK INTAKE; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1089/bfm.2008.0125
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Test weighing, or weighing the infant before and after breastfeeding to assess milk intake, in which weight gain in grams is converted equally to volume of intake in milliliters, is a controversial topic in the literature. This study was initiated to identify variables that impact test weights and to develop an accurate test weighing technique for preterm and high-risk hospitalized infants. Methods: Test weights were performed on a sample of hospitalized high-risk infants with and without leads who were bottle-or nasogastric-fed. Volume consumed was compared to weight gain to determine whether the developed technique was accurate. Results: In each group, with or without leads, only one measure of actual intake versus test weight result was found outside the confidence limits (95%), and only one measure was found outside the clinically acceptable difference of +/-5 g. Correlation coefficient (r(2)) values of weight gain by test weight to volume of intake were 0.998 for infants without leads and 0.997 for infants with leads. Conclusions: The data from this study support the use of this test weighing technique as an accurate, objective assessment of the measurement of breastmilk intake after a breastfeeding session, thus allowing medical decisions regarding supplementation to be based on objective data rather than inaccurate clinical indices of the quality of infant feedings at the breast.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1085-1087
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]  
Hill P D, 1997, J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, V26, P189, DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1997.tb02132.x
[4]   Mothers performing in-home measurement of milk intake during breastfeeding of their preterm infants: Maternal reactions and feeding outcomes [J].
Hurst, NM ;
Meier, PP ;
Engstrom, JL ;
Myatt, A .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN LACTATION, 2004, 20 (02) :178-187
[5]  
Kavanaugh K, 1995, J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, V24, P23, DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1995.tb02375.x
[6]  
Kavanaugh K, 1997, J Hum Lact, V13, P15, DOI 10.1177/089033449701300111
[7]   ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CLINICAL MEASUREMENT METHODS [J].
LIEHR, P ;
DEDO, YL ;
TORRES, S ;
MEININGER, JC .
HEART & LUNG, 1995, 24 (03) :240-245
[8]  
Meier P P, 1996, J Hum Lact, V12, P21, DOI 10.1177/089033449601200106
[9]  
Meier P P, 1994, J Hum Lact, V10, P163, DOI 10.1177/089033449401000312
[10]   Test weighing for term and premature infants is an accurate procedure [J].
Meier, Paula P. ;
Engstrom, Janet L. .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2007, 92 (02) :F155-F156