Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for multi-criteria evaluation of construction safety management

被引：0

作者：

Li, Chenghua ^{[1
]}

Yun, Xiaohong ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Architecture & Civil Engn, Chongqing, Peoples R China

来源：

PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEM, VOLS 1-4 | 2009年

关键词：

analytic hierarchy process; evaluation model; multi-criteria decision; safety management; triangular fuzzy numbers; PAIRWISE COMPARISON JUDGMENTS; DERIVING PRIORITIES; MODEL; AHP; CHINA;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

Owing to the increasing complexity in the construction safety management, experts' knowledge and experiences often need to be integrated in making appropriate decisions, whereas there are many difficulties and limitations in measuring safety management due to its fuzzy nature. For this reason, fuzzy AHP method is used to determine and evaluate construction safety management in this paper, which combined the concepts of fuzzy set theory and hierarchical structure analysis. A numerical example, drawn from the national standard of China, is presented to demonstrate the process. The validity of the model is tested to show the feasibility for applications in the end.

引用

页码：1561 / 1565

页数：5

共 50 条

[21] Multi-criteria group decision making based on neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process [J].

Abdel-Basset, Mohamed ;

Mohamed, Mai ;

Zhou, Yongquan ;

Hezam, Ibrahim .

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 33 (06) :4055-4066

[22] A sustainable forest management criteria and indicators assessment using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process [J].

Bayram, Bahadir Cagri .

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2021, 193 (07)

[23] Construction and demolition waste management: Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process approach [J].

Khoshand, Afshin ;

Khanlari, Kimia ;

Abbasianjahromi, Hamidreza ;

Zoghi, Milad .

WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2020, 38 (07) :773-782

[24] Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification by Using a Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (ANP) Approach [J].

Kiris, Safak .

INFORMATICA, 2013, 24 (02) :199-217

[25] Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Knowledge Management Tools [J].

Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;

Feyzioglu, Orhan ;

Cifci, Gizem .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2011, 4 (02) :184-195

[26] When should fuzzy analytic hierarchy process be used instead of analytic hierarchy process? [J].

Chan, Hing Kai ;

Sun, Xuting ;

Chung, Sai-Ho .

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2019, 125

[27] Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Watershed Prioritization Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Technique and GIS [J].

Chowdary, V. M. ;

Chakraborthy, D. ;

Jeyaram, A. ;

Murthy, Y. V. N. Krishna ;

Sharma, J. R. ;

Dadhwal, V. K. .

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2013, 27 (10) :3555-3571

[28] Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach to Urban Web Service Databases Evaluation Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process [J].

Zemtsov, Andrey ;

Tran Dung Khanh .

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR INTELLIGENT DECISION MAKING SUPPORT (ITIDS 2020), 2020, 174 :283-287

[29] Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using analytic hierarchy process [J].

Aras, H ;

Erdogmus, S ;

Koç, E .

RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2004, 29 (08) :1383-1392

[30] Does Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Work Better Than Analytic Hierarchy Process? [J].

Chen, Xiaofeng ;

Fang, Yanting ;

Chai, Junyi ;

Xu, Zeshui .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2022, 24 (02) :909-924

← 1 2 3 4 5 →