Conceptual design of structural systems based on topology optimization and prefabricated components

被引:38
作者
Sotiropoulos, Stefanos [1 ]
Kazakis, George [1 ]
Lagaros, Nikos D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Inst Struct Anal & Antiseism Res, Sch Civil Engn, Velt Engn & Appl Sci Optimizat Lab, 9 Heroon Polytech Str,Zografou Campus, GR-15780 Athens, Greece
关键词
Architectural conceptual design; Topology optimization; Computer-aided design (CAD); Computer-aided manufacturing (CAM); Prefabricated structural components; Grasshopper 3D algorithmic modelling; CODE WRITTEN; ALGORITHM; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.106136
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The scope of this work is to present a novel methodology that relies on topology optimization and aims to support architectural intuition; using prefabricated structural elements the methodology can assist conceptual design of larger scale structural systems. According to the proposed methodology, equivalent rectangular finite elements are generated based on multiple specifically shaped prefabricated units, which are treated by topology optimization as periodic unit cells. Using the methodology, aesthetic and manufacturing concerns are imposed into the mathematical formulation of the problem and innovative structural systems are developed that cannot be achieved through conventional approaches. The applicability of the proposed methodology is tested in 2D plane stress analysis problems and results for benchmark topology optimization problems are shown. 3D test cases are also examined where hangar and high-rise building type of structures are considered, simulated with 8-node hexahedron finite elements. Finally, a computing code is integrated into the Grasshopper 3D parametric design application, in order to interpret the optimized structures into the Rhino3D computer-aided design software. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Aage N, 2014, ADV ARCHITECTURAL GE, P159
[2]  
Abruzzese D, 2003, SYSTEM-BASED VISION FOR STRATEGIC AND CREATIVE DESIGN, VOLS 1-3, P569
[3]  
Adriaenssens S., 2014, Shell Structures for Architecture Form Finding and Optimization, P1, DOI [10.4324/9781315849270, DOI 10.4324/9781315849270]
[4]   Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method [J].
Allaire, G ;
Jouve, F ;
Toader, AM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2004, 194 (01) :363-393
[5]   Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code [J].
Andreassen, Erik ;
Clausen, Anders ;
Schevenels, Mattias ;
Lazarov, Boyan S. ;
Sigmund, Ole .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2011, 43 (01) :1-16
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, APPL METAHEURISTIC O, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-48012-1_15
[7]   Connecting architecture and engineering through structural topology optimization [J].
Beghini, Lauren L. ;
Beghini, Alessandro ;
Katz, Neil ;
Baker, William F. ;
Paulin, Glaucio H. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 59 :716-726
[8]  
Bendsoe M.P., 1989, STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZAT, V1, P193, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01650949, 10.1007/BF01650949]
[9]  
Bendsoe MP, 2005, CONTROL CYBERN, V34, P7
[10]   STRUCTURAL EMERGENCE: ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN COLLABORATION AT SOM [J].
Besserud, Keith ;
Katz, Neil ;
Beghini, Alessandro .
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, 2013, 83 (02) :48-55