共 50 条
MICA/B and ULBP1 NKG2D ligands are independent predictors of good prognosis in cervical cancer
被引:64
|作者:
Cho, Hanbyoul
[1
,2
,3
]
Chung, Joon-Yong
[3
]
Kim, Sunghoon
[2
,4
]
Braunschweig, Till
[3
,5
]
Kang, Tae Heung
[6
]
Kim, Jennie
[3
]
Chung, Eun Joo
[7
]
Hewitt, Stephen M.
[3
]
Kim, Jae-Hoon
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Yonsei Univ, Gangnam Severance Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med, Seoul 135720, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Inst Womens Life Med Sci, Seoul 135720, South Korea
[3] NCI, Tissue Array Res Program, Pathol Lab, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Severance Hosp, Seoul 135720, South Korea
[5] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Pathol, Aachen, Germany
[6] Konkuk Univ, Dept Immunol, Coll Med, Chungju, South Korea
[7] NCI, Radiat Oncol Branch, Ctr Canc Res, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
来源:
BMC CANCER
|
2014年
/
14卷
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词:
Cervical cancer;
Tissue microarray;
Immunohistochemistry;
NKG2D ligands;
NATURAL-KILLER-CELLS;
POOR-PROGNOSIS;
RETINOIC ACID;
EXPRESSION;
RECEPTOR;
CYTOTOXICITY;
WORLDWIDE;
CARCINOMA;
CHAIN;
D O I:
10.1186/1471-2407-14-957
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background: NKG2D (natural killer group 2, member D) is thought to play an important role in mediating the activation of anticancer immune response. Expression of NKG2D ligands (NKG2DLs) is pronounced in malignancies and the heterogeneity of NKG2DL expression remains unclear. Here, we investigate the expression and clinical significance of NKG2DLs in cervical cancer. Methods: Immunohistochemical analyses of MICA/B, ULBP1, ULBP2, ULBP3, RAET1E, and RAET1G were performed using tissue microarray analysis of 200 cervical cancers, 327 high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CINs), 99 low-grade CINs, and 541 matched nonadjacent normal cervical epithelial tissues and compared the data with clinicopathologic variables, including the survival of cervical cancer patients. Results: MICA/B, ULBP1, and RAET1E expression was higher in cervical cancer than in low-grade CIN (p < 0.001, p = 0.012, p = 0.013, respectively) and normal cervix (all p < 0.001). Among these markers, expression of ULBP1 was significantly different depending on patient tumor stage (p = 0.010) and tumor size (p = 0.045). ULBP1 expression was correlated with MICA/B (p < 0.001) and ULBP2 (p = 0.002) expression in cervical cancer. While MICA/B+ or ULBP1+ patients had improved disease-free survival time (p = 0.027 and p = 0.009, respectively) relative to that of the low expression group, RAET1E+ or RAET1G+ was correlated with shorter survival time (p = 0.018 and p = 0.029, respectively). However, in terms of overall survival, the ULBP1+ group had significantly longer survival time than the low expression group (p = 0.009). Multivariate analysis indicated that MICA/B+/ULBP1+ (HR = 0.16, p = 0.015) and ULBP1+ (HR = 0.31, p = 0.024) are independent prognostic factors of disease-free survival in cervical cancer. Conclusions: High expression of either ULBP1 or MICA/B and ULBP1 combined is an indicator of good prognosis in cervical cancer, suggesting their potential utility as prognostic tests in clinical assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文