Comparable efficacy of silk fibroin with the collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects

被引:43
作者
Kim, Jwa-Young [1 ]
Yang, Byoung-Eun [1 ]
Ahn, Jin-Hee [2 ]
Park, Sang O. [3 ]
Shim, Hye-Won [2 ]
机构
[1] Hallym Univ, Sacred Heart Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Anyang, South Korea
[2] Hallym Univ, Sacred Heart Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Prosthodont, Anyang 431796, South Korea
[3] Konkuk Univ, Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Silk; Bone regeneration; Membranes; Dental implants; Collagen; Guided tissue regeneration; BARRIER MEMBRANES; IN-VITRO; MICRO-CT; TISSUE REGENERATION; MANDIBULAR DEFECTS; IMPLANTS; BIOMATERIALS; MICRORADIOGRAPHY; AUGMENTATION; DEGRADATION;
D O I
10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.539
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. Silk fibroin (SF) is a new degradable barrier membrane for guided bone regeneration (GBR) that can reduce the risk of pathogen transmission and the high costs associated with the use of collagen membranes. This study compared the efficacy of SF membranes on GBR with collagen membranes (BioGide) using a rat calvarial defect model. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-six male Sprague Dawley rats with two 5 mm-sized circular defects in the calvarial bone were prepared (n=72): The study groups were divided into a control group (no membrane) and two experimental groups (SF membrane and Bio-Gide). Each group of 24 samples was subdivided at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implantation. New bone formation was evaluated using microcomputerized tomography and histological examination. RESULTS. Bone regeneration was observed in the SF and Bio-Gide (R) treated groups to a greater extent than in the control group (mean volume of new bone was 5.49 +/- 1.48 mm(3) at 8 weeks). There were different patterns of bone regeneration between the SF membrane and the Bio-Gide samples. However, the absolute volume of new bone in the SF membrane-treated group was not significantly different from that in the collagen membrane-treated group at 8 weeks (8.75 +/- 0.80 vs. 8.47 +/- 0.75 mm(3), respectively, P=.592). CONCLUSION. SF membranes successfully enhanced comparable volumes of bone regeneration in calvarial bone defects compared with collagen membranes. Considering the lower cost and lesser risk of infectious transmission from animal tissue, SF membranes are a viable alternative to collagen membranes for GBR.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 546
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Silk-based biomaterials
    Altman, GH
    Diaz, F
    Jakuba, C
    Calabro, T
    Horan, RL
    Chen, JS
    Lu, H
    Richmond, J
    Kaplan, DL
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS, 2003, 24 (03) : 401 - 416
  • [2] Becker B E, 1991, Curr Opin Dent, V1, P93
  • [3] Importance of the critical-size bone defect in testing bone-regenerating materials
    Bosch, C
    Melsen, B
    Vargervik, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 9 (04) : 310 - 316
  • [4] Biodegradation of Silk Biomaterials
    Cao, Yang
    Wang, Bochu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2009, 10 (04) : 1514 - 1524
  • [5] Evaluation of collagen-based membranes for guided bone regeneration, by three-dimensional computerized microtomography
    Coelho, Paulo Guilherme
    Giro, Gabriela
    Kim, Wanki
    Granato, Rodrigo
    Marin, Charles
    Bonfante, Estevam Augusto
    Bonfante, Samara
    Lilin, Thomas
    Suzuki, Marcelo
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 114 (04): : 437 - 443
  • [6] Dahlin C, 1989, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V4, P19
  • [7] Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique
    Dahlin, C.
    Andersson, L.
    Linde, A.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1991, 2 (04) : 159 - 165
  • [8] HEALING OF BONE DEFECTS BY GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION
    DAHLIN, C
    LINDE, A
    GOTTLOW, J
    NYMAN, S
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1988, 81 (05) : 672 - 676
  • [9] Dalstra M, 2001, ADV EXP MED BIOL, V496, P9
  • [10] Davarpanah M, 1991, J Parodontol, V10, P169