Everolimus (Certican) 12-month safety and efficacy versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant recipients

被引:134
作者
Vitko, S
Margreiter, R
Weimar, W
Dantal, J
Viljoen, HG
Li, YL
Jappe, A
Cretin, N
机构
[1] IKEM, Transplant Ctr, Prague 14021 4, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Innsbruck Hosp, Dept Transplant Surg, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Acad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Hop Hotel Dieu, Nantes, France
[5] Garden City Clin, Johannesburg, South Africa
[6] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
[7] Novartis Pharmaceut AG, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
kidney transplant; everolimus; rejection; cytomegalovirus; mycophenolate mofetil;
D O I
10.1097/01.TP.0000141094.34903.54
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Everolimus is a proliferation inhibitor designed to target chronic rejection, including prevention of acute rejection. Everolimus blocks growth factor-mediated transduction signals, preventing organ rejection by a mechanism different than that of calcineurin inhibitors and of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Methods. Everolimus (1.5 mg or 3 mg daily) was compared with MMF (2 g daily) in a randomized, multicenter, multinational, 12-month double-blind, double-dummy and 2-year open-label, phase 3 trial in de novo renal allograft recipients (n=588) who also received cyclosporine and corticosteroids as part of a triple immunosuppressive regimen. Results. At 12 months, there were no statistically significant differences between doses of 1.5 and 3 mg/day everolimus and MMF (2 g/day) in incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (23.2%, 19.7%, and 24.0%, respectively), graft loss (4.6%, 10.6%, and 9.2%), or death (5.2%, 4.0%, and 2.6%), respectively. Everolimus 1.5 mg/day and MMF were generally equally well tolerated. Both were better tolerated than everolimus 3 mg/day. The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection was significantly lower in patients receiving either 1.5 or 3 mg/day everolimus than in those receiving MMF (5.2% and 7.6% vs. 19.4%, respectively) (P=.001). Conclusions. Everolimus is effective in preventing acute rejection and graft loss in de novo renal allograft recipients receiving a triple immunosuppressive regimen. Prevention of acute rejection, along with reduction in cytomegalovirus infection, addresses two factors known to contribute to chronic rejection in such patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1532 / 1540
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Synergistic effects of cyclosporine and rapamycin in a chronic nephrotoxicity model [J].
Andoh, TF ;
Lindsley, J ;
Franceschini, N ;
Bennett, WM .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1996, 62 (03) :311-316
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM J TRANSPLANTAT S1
[3]  
[Anonymous], AM J TRANSPLANTAT S1
[4]  
[Anonymous], AM J TRANSPLANT
[5]   Effect of SDZ RAD on transplant arteriosclerosis in the rat aortic model [J].
Cole, OJ ;
Shehata, M ;
Rigg, KM .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (05) :2200-2203
[6]  
CURTIS J, 2001, AM J TRANSPLANT, V1, P299
[7]  
Demetris AJ, 1997, HEPATOLOGY, V25, P658
[8]   Coadministration of neoral and the novel rapamycin analog, SDZ RAD, to rat lung allograft recipients - Potentiation of immunosuppressive efficacy and improvement of tolerability by staggered versus simultaneous treatment [J].
Hausen, B ;
Boeke, K ;
Berry, GJ ;
Segarra, I ;
Benet, LZ ;
Christians, U ;
Morris, RE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (07) :956-962
[9]   Prevention of acute allograft rejection in nonhuman primate lung transplant recipients - Induction with chimeric anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody improves the tolerability and potentiates the immunosuppressive activity of a regimen using low doses of both microemulsion cyclosporine and 40-O-(2-hydroxyethyl)-rapamycin [J].
Hausen, B ;
Gummert, J ;
Berry, GJ ;
Christians, U ;
Serkova, N ;
Ikonen, T ;
Hook, L ;
Legay, F ;
Schuler, W ;
Schreier, MH ;
Morris, RE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (04) :488-496
[10]   Combined immunosuppression with cyclosporine (Neoral) and SDZ RAD in non-human primate lung transplantation: Systematic pharmacokinetic-based trials to improve efficacy and tolerability [J].
Hausen, B ;
Ikonen, T ;
Briffa, N ;
Berry, GJ ;
Christians, U ;
Robbins, RC ;
Hook, L ;
Serkova, N ;
Benet, LZ ;
Schuler, W ;
Morris, RE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (01) :76-86