Everolimus (Certican) 12-month safety and efficacy versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant recipients

被引:134
|
作者
Vitko, S
Margreiter, R
Weimar, W
Dantal, J
Viljoen, HG
Li, YL
Jappe, A
Cretin, N
机构
[1] IKEM, Transplant Ctr, Prague 14021 4, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Innsbruck Hosp, Dept Transplant Surg, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Acad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Hop Hotel Dieu, Nantes, France
[5] Garden City Clin, Johannesburg, South Africa
[6] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
[7] Novartis Pharmaceut AG, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
kidney transplant; everolimus; rejection; cytomegalovirus; mycophenolate mofetil;
D O I
10.1097/01.TP.0000141094.34903.54
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Everolimus is a proliferation inhibitor designed to target chronic rejection, including prevention of acute rejection. Everolimus blocks growth factor-mediated transduction signals, preventing organ rejection by a mechanism different than that of calcineurin inhibitors and of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Methods. Everolimus (1.5 mg or 3 mg daily) was compared with MMF (2 g daily) in a randomized, multicenter, multinational, 12-month double-blind, double-dummy and 2-year open-label, phase 3 trial in de novo renal allograft recipients (n=588) who also received cyclosporine and corticosteroids as part of a triple immunosuppressive regimen. Results. At 12 months, there were no statistically significant differences between doses of 1.5 and 3 mg/day everolimus and MMF (2 g/day) in incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (23.2%, 19.7%, and 24.0%, respectively), graft loss (4.6%, 10.6%, and 9.2%), or death (5.2%, 4.0%, and 2.6%), respectively. Everolimus 1.5 mg/day and MMF were generally equally well tolerated. Both were better tolerated than everolimus 3 mg/day. The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection was significantly lower in patients receiving either 1.5 or 3 mg/day everolimus than in those receiving MMF (5.2% and 7.6% vs. 19.4%, respectively) (P=.001). Conclusions. Everolimus is effective in preventing acute rejection and graft loss in de novo renal allograft recipients receiving a triple immunosuppressive regimen. Prevention of acute rejection, along with reduction in cytomegalovirus infection, addresses two factors known to contribute to chronic rejection in such patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1532 / 1540
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 12-month safety and efficacy of everolimus with reduced exposure cyclosporine in de novo renal transplant recipients
    Tedesco-Silva, Helio, Jr.
    Vitko, Stefan
    Pascual, Julio
    Eris, Josette
    Magee, John C.
    Whelchel, John
    Civati, Giovanni
    Campbell, Scott
    Alves-Filho, Gentil
    Bourbigot, Bernard
    Garcia, Valter Duro
    Leone, John
    Esmeraldo, Ronaldo
    Rigotti, Paolo
    Cambi, Vincenzo
    Haas, Tomas
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 20 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [2] Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Plus Low-Dose Tacrolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil Plus Standard-Dose Tacrolimus in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: 12-Month Data
    Qazi, Y.
    Shaffer, D.
    Kaplan, B.
    Kim, D. Y.
    Luan, F. L.
    Peddi, V. R.
    Shihab, F.
    Tomlanovich, S.
    Yilmaz, S.
    McCague, K.
    Patel, D.
    Mulgaonkar, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 (05) : 1358 - 1369
  • [3] Generic Formulation of Mycophenolate Mofetil (Myfenax) in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: Results of 12-Month Observation
    Rutkowski, B.
    Bzoma, B.
    Debska-Slizien, A.
    Chamienia, A.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2014, 46 (08) : 2683 - 2688
  • [4] 12-MONTH ATHENA STUDY: EVEROLIMUS VERSUS STANDARD REGIMEN IN DE NOVO RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    Sommerer, C.
    Suwelack, B.
    Dragun, D.
    Hauser, I.
    Schenker, P.
    Baeumer, D.
    Nashan, B.
    Thaiss, F.
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 28 : 450 - 450
  • [5] Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus With Low-Dose Tacrolimus in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: 12-Month Randomized Study
    Qazi, Y.
    Shaffer, D.
    Kaplan, B.
    Kim, D.
    Luan, F.
    Peddi, V.
    Shihab, F.
    Tomlanovich, S.
    Yilmaz, S.
    McCague, K.
    Patel, D.
    Mulgaonkar, S.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 98 : 80 - 80
  • [6] Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus With Low-Dose Tacrolimus in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: 12-Month Randomized Study
    Qazi, Y.
    Shaffer, D.
    Kaplan, B.
    Kim, D.
    Luan, F.
    Peddi, V.
    Shihab, F.
    Tomlanovich, S.
    Yilmaz, S.
    McCague, K.
    Patel, D.
    Mulgaonkar, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 80 - 80
  • [7] Economic evaluation of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in combination with cyclosporine and prednisolone in de novo renal transplant recipients
    Holmes, M
    Chilcott, J
    Walters, S
    Whitby, S
    Akehurst, R
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 17 (04) : 182 - 187
  • [8] THE TRANSFORM STUDY: 12-MONTH EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF EVEROLIMUS WITH REDUCED CALCINEURIN INHIBITOR IN DE NOVO KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    Pascual, Julio
    Berger, Stefan
    Witzke, Oliver
    Chadban, Steve
    Oppenheimer, Federico
    Oberbauer, Rainer
    Watarai, Yoshihiko
    Legendre, Christophe
    Luo, Wen-Lin
    Marti, Anamaria
    Bernhardt, Peter
    Tedesco, Helio
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 30 : 159 - 159
  • [9] Therapeutic equivalence of mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant recipients
    Salvadori, M
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) : 3245 - 3247
  • [10] Three-year efficacy and safety results from a study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients
    Vítko, S
    Margreiter, R
    Weimar, W
    Dantal, J
    Kuypers, D
    Winkler, M
    Oyen, O
    Viljoen, HG
    Filiptsev, P
    Sadek, S
    Li, YL
    Cretin, N
    Budde, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (10) : 2521 - 2530