Multi-actor multi-criteria sustainability assessment framework for energy and industrial systems in life cycle perspective under uncertainties. Part 1: weighting method

被引:12
|
作者
Ren, Jingzheng [1 ]
Ren, Xusheng [2 ]
Liang, Hanwei [3 ]
Dong, Liang [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhang, Long [6 ]
Luo, Xiao [7 ,8 ]
Yang, Yingkui [9 ]
Gao, Zhiqiu [10 ]
机构
[1] Hongkong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast & Evaluat Meteoro, Sch Geog & Remote Sensing, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Leiden Univ, CML, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] NIES, Ctr Social & Environm Syst Res, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
[6] China Univ Geosci, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[7] Tongji Univ, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[8] Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning & Design Inst, 1111 North Zhongshan Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[9] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Environm & Business Econ, DK-96700 Esbjerg, Denmark
[10] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, State Key Lab Atmospher Boundary Layer Phys & Atm, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Analytical hierarchy process; Interval number; Life cycle assessment; Multi-actor multi-criteria decision-making; Weights; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; FUZZY-AHP; CHINA; SECURITY; MODEL; LCA;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-016-1251-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle sustainability assessment is meaningful for the decision-makers/stakeholders to select the most sustainable option among multiple alternatives; however, there are usually various severe uncertainty problems in sustainability-oriented decision-making, i.e., the vagueness and ambiguity that existed in human judgments and the lack of information. This study aims at developing a novel life cycle multi-criteria sustainability assessment method for helping the decision-makers/stakeholders to determine the sustainability level of the industrial and energy systems. In part 1, an improved interval analytic hierarchy process (AHP) which allows multiple decision-makers/stakeholders to participate in the decision-making was developed to determine the weights of the criteria which were used in life cycle sustainability assessment. It is usually difficult for the decision-makers/stakeholders to use the numbers from 1 to 9 and their reciprocals for determining the comparison matrix when using the traditional AHP method for weight calculation, because human judgments usually involve various uncertainties. In order to the overcome this weak point of the traditional AHP, an improved AHP, so-called interval AHP, in which, multiple decision-makers/stakeholders are allowed to participate in the decision-making and allowed to use interval numbers instead of crisp numbers to establish the comparison matrix for determining the weights of the criteria for life cycle sustainability assessment, has been developed. The proposed method was used to determine the weights of the four aspects for life cycle sustainability assessment including economic, safety, social, and environmental aspects. Five representative stakeholders were invited to participate in the decision-making. After Monte Carlo simulation, the final weights of the four aspects have been determined with the proposed interval AHP. An interval AHP method was developed for determining the weights of the criteria for life cycle sustainability assessment; the decision-makers are allowed to use interval numbers to establish the comparison matrix for weight calculation. The weighting coefficients determined by Monte Carlo method can accurately reflect the preferences and willingness of multi-actor comparing with the traditional AHP method. This paper merely presents a novel method to calculate the weights of the criteria for life cycle sustainability assessment, but the method for determining the sustainability performance has been presented in part 2.
引用
收藏
页码:1397 / 1405
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Comprehensive Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Sustainable Material Selection Considering Life Cycle Assessment Method
    Ma, Fangwu
    Zhao, Ying
    Pu, Yongfeng
    Li, Jinhang
    IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 58338 - 58354
  • [42] Selection of alternative fuel taxis: a hybridized approach of life cycle sustainability assessment and multi-criteria decision making with neutrosophic sets
    Aboushaqrah, Nour N. M.
    Onat, Nuri Cihat
    Kucukvar, Murat
    Hamouda, A. M. S.
    Kusakci, Ali Osman
    Ayvaz, Berk
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION, 2022, 16 (09) : 833 - 846
  • [43] Combined application of multi-criteria optimization and life-cycle sustainability assessment for optimal distribution of alternative passenger cars in US
    Onat, Nuri Cihat
    Kucukvar, Murat
    Tatari, Omer
    Zheng, Qipeng Phil
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 291 - 307
  • [44] A CAR-PROMETHEE-based multi-criteria decision-making framework for sustainability assessment of renewable energy technologies in Morocco
    Gouraizim, Mohamed
    Makan, Abdelhadi
    El Ouarghi, Hossain
    OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (03) : 1343 - 1358
  • [45] Groundwater sustainability assessment under climate change scenarios using integrated modelling approach and multi-criteria decision method
    Mundetia, Nitika
    Sharma, Devesh
    Sharma, Aditya
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2024, 487
  • [46] A CAR-PROMETHEE-based multi-criteria decision-making framework for sustainability assessment of renewable energy technologies in Morocco
    Mohamed Gouraizim
    Abdelhadi Makan
    Hossain El Ouarghi
    Operations Management Research, 2023, 16 : 1343 - 1358
  • [47] Comparative assessment of selected sugarcane biorefinery-centered systems in Brazil: A multi-criteria method based on sustainability indicators
    Gnansounou, Edgard
    Alves, Catarina M.
    Pachon, Elia Ruiz
    Vaskan, Pavel
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 243 : 600 - 610
  • [48] Technology selection for sustainable hydrogen production: A multi-criteria assessment framework under uncertainties based on the combined weights and interval best-worst projection method
    Xu, Di
    Li, Weichen
    Ren, Xusheng
    Shen, Weifeng
    Dong, Lichun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (59) : 34396 - 34411
  • [49] UNCERTAINTY IN LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF NANOMATERIALS Multi-criteria Decision Analysis Framework for Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes in Power Applications
    Seager, T. P.
    Linkov, I.
    NANOMATERIALS: RISKS AND BENEFITS, 2009, : 423 - +
  • [50] Evaluating environmental and economic benefits of using biochar in concrete: A life cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision-making framework
    Mekky, Khadiga M.
    Ibrahim, Mona G.
    Sharobim, Kamal
    Fujii, Manabu
    Nasr, Mahmoud
    CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2024, 21