Multi-actor multi-criteria sustainability assessment framework for energy and industrial systems in life cycle perspective under uncertainties. Part 1: weighting method

被引:12
|
作者
Ren, Jingzheng [1 ]
Ren, Xusheng [2 ]
Liang, Hanwei [3 ]
Dong, Liang [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhang, Long [6 ]
Luo, Xiao [7 ,8 ]
Yang, Yingkui [9 ]
Gao, Zhiqiu [10 ]
机构
[1] Hongkong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast & Evaluat Meteoro, Sch Geog & Remote Sensing, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Leiden Univ, CML, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] NIES, Ctr Social & Environm Syst Res, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
[6] China Univ Geosci, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[7] Tongji Univ, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[8] Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning & Design Inst, 1111 North Zhongshan Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[9] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Environm & Business Econ, DK-96700 Esbjerg, Denmark
[10] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, State Key Lab Atmospher Boundary Layer Phys & Atm, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Analytical hierarchy process; Interval number; Life cycle assessment; Multi-actor multi-criteria decision-making; Weights; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; FUZZY-AHP; CHINA; SECURITY; MODEL; LCA;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-016-1251-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle sustainability assessment is meaningful for the decision-makers/stakeholders to select the most sustainable option among multiple alternatives; however, there are usually various severe uncertainty problems in sustainability-oriented decision-making, i.e., the vagueness and ambiguity that existed in human judgments and the lack of information. This study aims at developing a novel life cycle multi-criteria sustainability assessment method for helping the decision-makers/stakeholders to determine the sustainability level of the industrial and energy systems. In part 1, an improved interval analytic hierarchy process (AHP) which allows multiple decision-makers/stakeholders to participate in the decision-making was developed to determine the weights of the criteria which were used in life cycle sustainability assessment. It is usually difficult for the decision-makers/stakeholders to use the numbers from 1 to 9 and their reciprocals for determining the comparison matrix when using the traditional AHP method for weight calculation, because human judgments usually involve various uncertainties. In order to the overcome this weak point of the traditional AHP, an improved AHP, so-called interval AHP, in which, multiple decision-makers/stakeholders are allowed to participate in the decision-making and allowed to use interval numbers instead of crisp numbers to establish the comparison matrix for determining the weights of the criteria for life cycle sustainability assessment, has been developed. The proposed method was used to determine the weights of the four aspects for life cycle sustainability assessment including economic, safety, social, and environmental aspects. Five representative stakeholders were invited to participate in the decision-making. After Monte Carlo simulation, the final weights of the four aspects have been determined with the proposed interval AHP. An interval AHP method was developed for determining the weights of the criteria for life cycle sustainability assessment; the decision-makers are allowed to use interval numbers to establish the comparison matrix for weight calculation. The weighting coefficients determined by Monte Carlo method can accurately reflect the preferences and willingness of multi-actor comparing with the traditional AHP method. This paper merely presents a novel method to calculate the weights of the criteria for life cycle sustainability assessment, but the method for determining the sustainability performance has been presented in part 2.
引用
收藏
页码:1397 / 1405
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Sustainability assessment of CCS technologies by combining multi-criteria decision making with life cycle assessment
    Li, Weichen
    Xu, Di
    Ding, Shimin
    Dong, Lichun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (05): : 479 - 494
  • [12] Sustainability assessment of CCS technologies by combining multi-criteria decision making with life cycle assessment
    Weichen Li
    Di Xu
    Shimin Ding
    Lichun Dong
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2023, 28 (5) : 479 - 494
  • [13] LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING IN BRIDGE DESIGN: A REVIEW
    Navarro, Ignacio Javier
    Penades-Pla, Vicent
    Martinez-Munoz, David
    Rempling, Rasmus
    Yepes, Victor
    JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 26 (07) : 690 - 704
  • [14] Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of water desalination and energy systems - Kuwait case
    Afgan, Naim Hamdia
    Darwish, Mohammed
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2011, 25 (1-3) : 241 - 250
  • [15] Life cycle sustainability decision-support framework for ranking of hydrogen production pathways under uncertainties: An interval multi-criteria decision making approach
    Ren, Jingzheng
    Toniolo, Sara
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 175 : 222 - 236
  • [16] Biofuels for a more sustainable future: Life cycle sustainability assessment and multi-criteria decision making
    Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan
    Asheri-Gafsheh, Elnaz
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2024, 102
  • [17] A multi-criteria decision method for sustainability assessment of the use phase of machine tool systems
    Avram, Oliver
    Stroud, Ian
    Xirouchakis, Paul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 53 (5-8): : 811 - 828
  • [18] A multi-criteria decision method for sustainability assessment of the use phase of machine tool systems
    Oliver Avram
    Ian Stroud
    Paul Xirouchakis
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 53 : 811 - 828
  • [19] A review of life-cycle approaches coupled with data envelopment analysis within multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainability assessment of energy systems
    Martin-Gamboa, Mario
    Iribarren, Diego
    Garcia-Gusano, Diego
    Dufour, Javier
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 150 : 164 - 174
  • [20] Environmental assessment framework for policy applications: Life cycle assessment, external costs and multi-criteria analysis
    Rabl, Ari
    Holland, Mike
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 51 (01) : 81 - 105