Coastal Erosion of Arctic Cultural Heritage in Danger: A Case Study from Svalbard, Norway

被引:26
作者
Nicu, Ionut Cristi [1 ]
Rubensdotter, Lena [2 ,3 ]
Stalsberg, Knut [4 ]
Nau, Erich [5 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Cultural Heritage Res NIKU, Fram Ctr, High North Dept, N-9296 Tromso, Norway
[2] Geol Survey Norway NGU, POB 6315, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[3] Univ Ctr Svalbard UNIS, Arctic Geol Dept, POB 156, N-9171 Longyearbyen, Norway
[4] Geol Survey Norway NGU, Fram Ctr, N-9296 Tromso, Norway
[5] Norwegian Inst Cultural Heritage Res NIKU, Dept Digital Archaeol, Storgata 2, N-0155 Oslo, Norway
关键词
coastal erosion; cultural heritage; high arctic; monitoring; Svalbard; DSAS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RISK; THREAT; DYNAMICS; SITES;
D O I
10.3390/w13060784
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Strong cultural heritage management relies on a thorough evaluation of the threats faced by heritage sites, both in the present and in the future. In this study, we analysed the changes in the position of Hiorthhamn shoreline (Svalbard), which is affecting coastal cultural heritage sites, for a period of 93 years (1927-2020). Shoreline changes were mapped by using maps, ortophotos, drone images, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), and topographic surveys. Also, TLS was used to 3D document the endangered coastal cultural heritage sites. Detailed sedimentological and morphological mapping was made in the field and from the newly acquired drone images in order to understand shoreline-landscape interaction and to depict changes occurring from 2019 to 2020. Short-term (2019-2020) and long-term (1927-2020) shoreline erosion/accretion was made with the help of the Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) and prompted a subdivision of three sectors, based on change pattern. Compared to a previous long-term analysis (1927-2019), this year's average erosion rate analysis (expressed by the EPR parameter) for the 93-year period is -0.14 m/yr. This shift in mean development is due to a newly formed spit-bar in Sector 2. Referring strictly to Sector 1, where the protected cultural heritage objects are located, the erosion rate increased from the previous analysis of -0.76 m/yr to -0.77 m/yr. The shoreline forecast analysis highlights that half of the protected cultural heritage objects will likely disappear over the next decade and almost all the cultural heritage objects analysed in this study will disappear in roughly two decades. This shows the great danger the Arctic's cultural heritage sites is in if no mitigation measures are undertaken by the local authorities.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Arlov ThorB., 1989, SHORT HIST SVALBARD
  • [2] The impact of Arctic warming on increased rainfall
    Bintanja, R.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [3] Vulnerabilities and displacements: adaptation and mitigation to climate change as a new development mantra
    Bose, Pablo S.
    [J]. AREA, 2016, 48 (02) : 168 - 175
  • [4] Central Svalbard 2000-2011 Meteorological Dynamics and Periglacial Landscape Response
    Christiansen, Hanne H.
    Humlum, Ole
    Eckerstorfer, Markus
    [J]. ARCTIC ANTARCTIC AND ALPINE RESEARCH, 2013, 45 (01) : 6 - 18
  • [5] Dallmann W K., 2001, Geological map of Svalbard 1:100,000 Sheet C9G Adventdalen, P4
  • [6] Dawson PC, 2013, ARCTIC, V66, P147
  • [7] Surface morphology of fans in the high-Arctic periglacial environment of Svalbard: Controls and processes
    de Haas, Tjalling
    Kleinhans, Maarten G.
    Carbonneau, Patrice E.
    Rubensdotter, Lena
    Hauber, Ernst
    [J]. EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2015, 146 : 163 - 182
  • [8] Freeze/thaw conditions at periglacial landforms in Kapp Linne, Svalbard, investigated using field observations, in situ, and radar satellite monitoring
    Eckerstorfer, M.
    Malnes, E.
    Christiansen, H. H.
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2017, 293 : 433 - 447
  • [9] Esau I., 2012, ADV METEOROL, V2012, P1, DOI [10.1155/2012/818473, DOI 10.1155/2012/818473]
  • [10] Are cultural heritage and resources threatened by climate change? A systematic literature review
    Fatoric, Sandra
    Seekamp, Erin
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2017, 142 (1-2) : 227 - 254