Prevention of hip fractures by external hip protectors - A randomized controlled trial

被引:96
作者
van Schoor, NM
Smit, JH
Twisk, JWR
Bouter, LM
Lips, P
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Endocrinol, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Inst Res Extramural Med, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Sociol & Social Gerontol, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2003年 / 289卷 / 15期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.289.15.1957
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Several randomized controlled trials have been performed to examine the effectiveness of external hip protectors in reducing the incidence of hip fractures, but the results are controversial. Objective To examine the effectiveness of hip protectors in reducing the incidence of hip fractures in an elderly high-risk population. Design, Setting, and Participants Randomized controlled trial of elderly persons aged 70 years or older, who have low bone density, and are at high risk for falls. Participants lived in apartment houses for the elderly, homes for the elderly, and nursing homes in Amsterdam and surrounding areas in the Netherlands. They were enrolled in the study between March 1999 and March 2001; the mean follow-up was 69.6 weeks. Of the 830 persons who were screened, 561 persons were enrolled. Intervention External hip protector. Both groups received written information on bone health and risk factors for falls. Main Outcome Measure Time to first hip fracture. Survival analysis was used to include all participants for the time they participated. Results In the intervention group, 18 hip fractures occurred vs 20 in the control group. Four hip fractures in the intervention group occurred while an individual was wearing a hip protector. At least 4 hip fractures in the intervention group occurred late at night or early in the morning. Both in univariate analysis (log-rank P=.86) and in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-2.03), no statistically significant difference between the intervention group and control group. was found with regard to time to first hip fracture. In addition, the per protocol analysis in compliant participants did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups (HR, 0.77; 95% Cl, 0.25-2.38). Conclusion The hip protector studied was not effective in preventing hip fractures.
引用
收藏
页码:1957 / 1962
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], OSTEOPOROSIS INT
[2]  
BOEREBOOM FTJ, 1991, NETH J MED, V38, P51
[3]   Hip protectors in aged-care facilities: a randomized trial of use by individual higher-risk residents [J].
Cameron, ID ;
Venman, J ;
Kurrle, SE ;
Lockwood, K ;
Birks, C ;
Cumming, RG ;
Quine, S ;
Bashford, G .
AGE AND AGEING, 2001, 30 (06) :477-481
[4]   Effectiveness and acceptability of a newly designed hip protector: a pilot study [J].
Chan, DK ;
Hillier, G ;
Coore, M ;
Cooke, R ;
Monk, R ;
Mills, J ;
Hung, WT .
ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2000, 30 (01) :25-34
[5]   HIP-FRACTURES IN THE ELDERLY - A WORLDWIDE PROJECTION [J].
COOPER, C ;
CAMPION, G ;
MELTON, LJ .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 2 (06) :285-289
[6]   External hip protectors to prevent osteoporotic hip fractures [J].
Ekman, A ;
Mallmin, H ;
Michaëlsson, K ;
Ljunghall, S .
LANCET, 1997, 350 (9077) :563-564
[7]  
Graafmans WC, 1996, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V143, P1129
[8]   Hip fracture prevention trial using hip protectors in Japanese nursing homes [J].
Harada, A ;
Mizuno, M ;
Takemura, M ;
Tokuda, H ;
Okuizumi, H ;
Niino, N .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 12 (03) :215-221
[9]   Acceptance of hip protectors for hip fracture prevention in nursing homes [J].
Hubacher, M ;
Wettstein, A .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 12 (09) :794-799
[10]   FALLS AMONG ELDERLY NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS [J].
JANTTI, PO ;
PYYKKO, VI ;
HERVONEN, ALJ .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 1993, 107 (02) :89-96