Electronic Devices and Web 2.0 Tools: Usage Trends in Engineering Students

被引:0
|
作者
Humanante-Ramos, Patricio R. [1 ]
Garcia-Penalvo, Francisco J. [2 ]
Conde-Gonzalez, Miguel A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Chimborazo, Fac Educ Sci Humanities & Technol, Riobamba 060150, Ecuador
[2] Univ Salamanca, GRIAL Res Grp, E-37008 Salamanca, Spain
[3] Univ Leon, Sch Engn, Dept Mech Aerosp & Comp Engn, E-24071 Leon, Spain
关键词
Personal Learning Environments (PLE); mobile learning; Web; 2.0; ICT; higher education; MOBILE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Personal Learning Environments or PLE are student centred spaces, which take into account theirs needs, learning styles and preferences. These spaces appear as important alternatives to overcome the shortcomings encountered with the use of institutional platforms. On the other hand, there is widespread use of mobile electronic devices and Web 2.0 tools among university students, mainly for communication and leisure activities, but that could be used for educational purposes. This research aims to make a diagnosis on access to and use of electronic devices and the web tools by students of the degree of Systems Engineering and Computer Science at Faculty of Engineering at the National University of Chimborazo in Ecuador, from the viewpoint of PLE. A methodological level corresponds to a quantitative and non-experimental research, ex-post-facto. The results show certain trends in the types of devices and their frequency of use, as well as their preferences for the tools to obtain and to find information, not only to create but to edit content and communicate with others, where they prioritize the use of certain social networks and some tools of synchronous and asynchronous communication. One of the main conclusions of this study mentions the huge potential currently offered by Web 2.0 tools to structure the PLE of college students, as well as the great potential for integration with mobile device.
引用
收藏
页码:790 / 796
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] NeoGeography and Web 2.0: concepts, tools and applications
    Hudson-Smith, Andrew
    Crooks, Andrew
    Gibin, Maurizio
    Milton, Richard
    Batty, Michael
    JOURNAL OF LOCATION BASED SERVICES, 2009, 3 (02) : 118 - 145
  • [42] A comparison of Web 2.0 tools in a doctoral course
    Meyer, Katrina A.
    INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 13 (04) : 226 - 232
  • [43] On Recommending Web 2.0 Tools to Personalise Learning
    Juskevicene, Anita
    Kurilovas, Eugenijus
    INFORMATICS IN EDUCATION, 2014, 13 (01): : 17 - 31
  • [44] Adoption of Web 2.0 tools in distance education
    Usluel, Yasemin Kocak
    Mazman, Sacide Guezin
    WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES - NEW TRENDS AND ISSUES IN EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, 2009, 1 (01): : 818 - 823
  • [45] USE OF WEB 2.0 TOOLS ON "BIODIVERSITY" IN LEARNING
    Toper, O.
    Paker, O.
    Ozel, S.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED), 2018, : 9603 - 9607
  • [46] EXPERIENCE WITH MOODLE AND WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN POSTGRADUATE
    Avello Martinez, Raidell
    Rodriguez Munoz, Raul
    Duenas Figueredo, Jorge Osmani
    REVISTA UNIVERSIDAD Y SOCIEDAD, 2016, 8 (04): : 57 - 63
  • [47] The Profile of the students as prosumers in web 2.0
    Sarsa, Javier
    JOURNAL FOR EDUCATORS TEACHERS AND TRAINERS, 2014, 5 (02): : 74 - 87
  • [48] Social software and academic practice: Postgraduate students as co-designers of Web 2.0 tools
    Carmichael, Patrick
    Burchmore, Helen
    INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 13 (04) : 233 - 241
  • [49] Web 2.0: Easy Tools for Busy Clinicians
    Phillippi, Julia C.
    Buxton, Margaret
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2010, 55 (05) : 472 - 476
  • [50] USING WEB 2.0 AND ONTOLOGIES AS LEARNING TOOLS
    Leon, Raul
    Ferrero, Idoya
    Jesus Munoz, Maria
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2010), 2010, : 4962 - 4970