The model of sustainable management of building energy performance characteristics

被引:0
作者
Mikucioniene, Ruta [1 ]
Martinaitis, Vytautas [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
来源
9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (9TH ICEE) - SELECTED PAPERS | 2014年
关键词
energy efficiency in building; sustainability continual improvement; decision making; criteria; SAVING MEASURES; RENOVATION; EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENT; SELECTION;
D O I
10.3846/enviro.2014.272
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The straight way to perform the targets of the Energy Efficiency Directive is the renovation of the existing buildings. Qualitative renovation begins by professional analysis of actual energy consumption and by choosing the packet of energy efficiency measures. The methodology for continual improvement and handy decision making can help to enhance the renovation process. This paper presents the concept of the model of sustainable management of building energy performance characteristics. The model is the algorithm for continual process for evaluation of current building construction operating and maintenance information, evaluation and prioritization of energy efficiency measures, the formation of their packets for suggestions for decision maker or for building administrator. In the presented model the five main criteria (energy efficiency, environmental impact, economical rationality, comfort and duration under Life cycle point of view) are used as criteria reflecting sustainable attitude. Sequential prioritization and distribution decision tree is constructed for distribution of energy efficiency measures to the basic and additional energy efficiency measures. The case study illustrates the optimization of packets formation, and represents the systemized information output for decision maker or building administrator.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]  
Martinaitis V., 2013, CYSENI 2013 10 INT C, P285
[22]   A two-factor method for appraising building renovation and energy efficiency improvement projects [J].
Martinaitis, Vytautas ;
Kazakevicius, Eduardas ;
Vitkauskas, Aloyzas .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (01) :192-201
[23]   Economic evaluation of energy saving measures in a common type of Greek building [J].
Nikolaidis, Yiannis ;
Pilavachi, Petros A. ;
Chletsis, Alexandros .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2009, 86 (12) :2550-2559
[24]   A multiple objective model to deal with economy-energy-environment interactions [J].
Oliveira, C ;
Antunes, CH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 153 (02) :370-385
[25]   A review of benchmarking, rating and labelling concepts within the framework of building energy certification schemes [J].
Perez-Lombard, Luis ;
Ortiz, Jose ;
Gonzalez, Rocio ;
Maestre, Ismael R. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2009, 41 (03) :272-278
[26]   Method for component-based economical optimisation for use in design of new low-energy buildings [J].
Petersen, Steffen ;
Svendsen, Svend .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2012, 38 (01) :173-180
[27]  
Risholt C. B., 2013, ENERGY BUILDINGS, V60
[28]   A formwork method selection model based on boosted decision trees in tall building construction [J].
Shin, Yoonseok ;
Kim, Taehoon ;
Cho, Hunhee ;
Kang, Kyung-In .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 23 :47-54
[29]   Sensitivity of the total heat loss coefficient determined by the energy signature approach to different time periods and gained energy [J].
Sjogren, J. -U. ;
Andersson, S. ;
Olofsson, T. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2009, 41 (07) :801-808
[30]  
Uzsilaityte L., 2010, ENERGETIKA, P146