A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development

被引:341
作者
Krajnc, D [1 ]
Glavic, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maribor, Fac Chem & Chem Engn, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
关键词
sustainable development; sustainability indicators; composite index; sustainability assessment; multiattribute decision-making;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.06.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The focus of the paper is on consideration of how to use indicators to monitor sustainable development in a relevant and useful manner. Integrated information on sustainable development of a company is very essential for decision-making since it is very difficult to evaluate the performance of the company on the ground of too many indicators. The objective of the work was to design a model for obtaining a composite sustainable development index (I-CSD) in order to track integrated information on economic, environmental, and social performance of the company with time. Normalized indicators were associated into three sustainability sub-indices and finally composed into an overall indicator of a company performance. This was applied by determining the impact of individual indicator to the overall sustainability of a company using the concept of analytic hierarchy process. The demonstration of the model used data for a case study company, Henkel, and a set of sustainable development indicators that were classified using the currently most widely accepted approach of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Case study was used to measure I-CSD and sustainability sub-indices of the company over the time interval of 6 years. Interpretation of results is given and the utility of I-CSD with its relevance for decision-making is pointed out. Using a case study, the paper demonstrates that the model can be applied to deliver composite indicators of sustainability performance of companies. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 208
页数:20
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
*AICHE CTR WAST RE, 2004, FOC AR SUST METR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CORPORATE RESPONSIBI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SUST REP GUID 2002 E
[4]   Indicators of sustainable development for industry: A general framework [J].
Azapagic, A ;
Perdan, S .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2000, 78 (B4) :243-261
[5]   Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry [J].
Azapagic, A .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2004, 12 (06) :639-662
[6]  
Daly HermanE., 1994, For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future, V2nd
[7]  
*DJSI, 2003, DOW JON SUST WORLD I
[8]   Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchy process [J].
Hafeez, K ;
Zhang, YB ;
Malak, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2002, 76 (01) :39-51
[9]  
HENKEL, 2003, SUSTAINABILITY REPOR
[10]  
*ICHEME, 2004, SUST DEV PROGR METR