A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development

被引:340
|
作者
Krajnc, D [1 ]
Glavic, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maribor, Fac Chem & Chem Engn, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
关键词
sustainable development; sustainability indicators; composite index; sustainability assessment; multiattribute decision-making;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.06.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The focus of the paper is on consideration of how to use indicators to monitor sustainable development in a relevant and useful manner. Integrated information on sustainable development of a company is very essential for decision-making since it is very difficult to evaluate the performance of the company on the ground of too many indicators. The objective of the work was to design a model for obtaining a composite sustainable development index (I-CSD) in order to track integrated information on economic, environmental, and social performance of the company with time. Normalized indicators were associated into three sustainability sub-indices and finally composed into an overall indicator of a company performance. This was applied by determining the impact of individual indicator to the overall sustainability of a company using the concept of analytic hierarchy process. The demonstration of the model used data for a case study company, Henkel, and a set of sustainable development indicators that were classified using the currently most widely accepted approach of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Case study was used to measure I-CSD and sustainability sub-indices of the company over the time interval of 6 years. Interpretation of results is given and the utility of I-CSD with its relevance for decision-making is pointed out. Using a case study, the paper demonstrates that the model can be applied to deliver composite indicators of sustainability performance of companies. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 208
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrated Model for Sustainable Development
    Varma, Vineet. H.
    Chattopadhyay, Gopi
    IEEM: 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 1819 - 1823
  • [2] INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: LITHUANIAN CASE
    Ciegis, Remigijus
    Ramanauskiene, Jolita
    MANAGEMENT THEORY AND STUDIES FOR RURAL BUSINESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 26 : 39 - 49
  • [3] MPC as a tool for sustainable development integrated policy assessment
    Kouvaritakis, B
    Cannon, A
    Couchman, P
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2006, 51 (01) : 145 - 149
  • [4] Integrated assessment of sustainable development:: multiple perspectives in interaction
    Kasemir, B
    van Asselt, MBA
    Dürrenberger, G
    Jaeger, CC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 1999, 11 (04) : 407 - 425
  • [5] Towards an integrated model for developing sustainable assessment skills
    Fastre, Greet M. J.
    van der Klink, Marcel R.
    Sluijsmans, Dominique
    van Merrienboer, Jeroen J. G.
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 38 (05) : 611 - 630
  • [6] Criteria Assessment Model for Sustainable Product Development
    Turan, Faiz Mohd
    Johan, Kartina
    Nor, Nik Hisyamudin Muhd
    INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND INNOVATION SYMPOSIUM (IRIS), 2016, 160
  • [7] Performance Management Assessment Model for Sustainable Development
    Fechete, Flavia
    Nedelcu, Anisor
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (10):
  • [8] Development of a maturity assessment model for sustainable tourism
    Franz, Hannah Carolin
    Cruz, Ana Rita
    CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2024,
  • [9] INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT OF BUILDINGS QUALITY IN THE CONTEXT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES
    Kozlovska, Maria
    Strukova, Zuzana
    Tazikova, Alena
    QUALITY INNOVATION PROSPERITY-KVALITA INOVACIA PROSPERITA, 2014, 18 (02): : 100 - 115
  • [10] INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MECHANISM OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF UKRAINIAN COMPANIES
    Hrybinenko, Olha
    10TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT 2018, 2018, : 74 - 82