共 50 条
Testing CFD-DEM method with a stochastic drag formulation using particle-resolved direct numerical simulation data as benchmark
被引:10
|作者:
Wang, Junwu
[1
,2
,3
]
Zhao, Peng
[1
,2
]
Zhao, Bidan
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Proc Engn, State Key Lab Multiphase Complex Syst, POB 353, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Chem Engn, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Innovat Acad Green Mfg, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
Drag force;
Direct numerical simulation;
Discrete particle method;
Fluidization;
Multiphase flow;
GRANULAR TEMPERATURE;
FLUID-FLOW;
MODEL;
FORCE;
DISPERSE;
2-FLUID;
ARRAYS;
SCALE;
BEDS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ces.2021.116657
中图分类号:
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号:
0817 ;
摘要:
Detailed comparison between particle-resolved direct numerical simulations (PR-DNS) and standard CFD-DEM simulations have concluded that the effective interphase drag force was underestimated by currently available drag correlations. Furthermore, PR-DNS have found that the force exerted on a single particle varies significantly even in statistically homogeneous systems, which was unfortunately not considered in standard CFD-DEM simulations. Therefore, it is interesting to test if CFD-DEM simulation with a stochastic drag formulation (stochastic CFD-DEM method) was able to obtain a better agreement with the data of PR-DNS. In this short communication, stochastic CFD-DEM method was assessed using the PR DNS data of Tang et al. (2016) and Luo et al. (2016) as benchmark. It was found that although a minor improvement can be achieved, stochastic CFD-DEM method was insufficient to fill the gap between PR-DNS and CFD-DEM simulations. Therefore, effort is still needed to develop a better drag model after extensive studies, where the detailed information of particle configuration may need to be properly used. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文