Has river rehabilitation begun? Social perspectives from the Upper Hunter catchment, New South Wales, Australia

被引:28
|
作者
Spink, Alexandra [1 ]
Hillman, Mick [2 ]
Fryirs, Kirstie [1 ]
Brierley, Gary [3 ]
Lloyd, Kate [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Dept Geog & Environm, N Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia
[2] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Fac Sci & Engn, Dept Environm & Geog Sci, Manchester M15 6BH, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Auckland, Sch Geog Geol & Environm Sci, Auckland 1, New Zealand
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Geo-social; River rehabilitation; Transdisciplinary; Place; Environmental history; River works; Hunter catchment; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC SUPPORT; RESTORATION; SUSTAINABILITY; STAKEHOLDERS; SCIENTISTS; CALIFORNIA; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.12.003
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Recognition of the degraded state of rivers across the world has prompted the development of management programmes which promote river repair through rehabilitation practices. Efforts to date have emphasised concerns for biophysical attributes of rivers to the relative exclusion of socio-cultural values. Ultimately, the process of river repair must move beyond this technical focus and incorporate collective societal engagement, participation and ownership. However, the inherent complexities of informing and managing this process limit the prospects that engagement will be translated into an effective and sustained practice. This qualitative case study research analyses the community's knowledge, views and opinions regarding geomorphic river change and river works projects undertaken in the Upper Hunter catchment, New South Wales. Australia. The responses and views expressed by the participants highlight how ineffective communication and limited understanding of past river work practices has inhibited the connection and ownership between the people and their river. Essentially, historical river management was viewed as a technical process that failed to incorporate social values and aspirations. and which gave inadequate consideration to local knowledge and experience. Participants identified the need to address both diversity and commonality in vision-building and the need for greater confidence and transparency in river science and management. In light of these responses, this paper argues for the adoption of a geosocial, transdisciplinary approach to river rehabilitation. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 409
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条