An Algorithm for Converting Ordinal Scale Measurement Data to Interval/Ratio Scale

被引:17
作者
Granberg-Rademacker, J. Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] Mankato State Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Law Enforcement, Mankato, MN 56001 USA
关键词
data measurement; measurement theory; Markov chain Monte Carlo; PUBLIC-OPINION; STATISTICS; MISCONCEPTION; KNOWLEDGE; VIEW;
D O I
10.1177/0013164409344532
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The extensive use of survey instruments in the social sciences has long created debate and concern about validity of outcomes, especially among instruments that gather ordinal-level data. Ordinal-level survey measurement of concepts that could be measured at the interval or ratio level produce errors because respondents are forced to truncate or round off their responses to fit a given ordinal scale. This article presents a Markov chain Monte Carlo modeling technique that converts ordinal measurements to interval/ ratio. Simulated data demonstrate the robustness of this technique, and implications of this technique are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 90
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Agresti A., 2001, ANAL ORDINAL CATEGOR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, ITEM RESPONSE THEORY
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, Survey research methods
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1996, An introduction to survey research, polling, and data analysis
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1993, Differential Item Functioning
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1985, ITEM RESPONSE THEORY
  • [7] MEASURING POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE - PUTTING 1ST THINGS 1ST
    CARPINI, MXD
    KEETER, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 37 (04) : 1179 - 1206
  • [8] The determinants of literacy and numeracy, and the effect of literacy and numeracy on labour market outcomes
    Charette, MF
    Meng, R
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 1998, 31 (03): : 495 - 517
  • [9] Converse J. M., 1986, SURVEY QUESTIONS HAN
  • [10] Democracy and the violation of human rights: A statistical analysis from 1976 to 1996
    Davenport, C
    Armstrong, DA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 48 (03) : 538 - 554