Evaluation of tibial torsion - Comparison of clinical methods and computed tomography

被引:16
作者
Bouchard, R
Meeder, PJ
Krug, F
Libicher, M
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Heidelberg, Abt Radiodiagnost, D-60120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Allgemeines Krankenhaus Hamburg Eilbek, Sekt Unfall & Gelenkchirurg, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Heidelberg, Seckt Unfall & Wiederherstellungschirurg, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Univ Klinikum Schleswig Holstein, Klin Chirurg, Lubeck, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2004年 / 176卷 / 09期
关键词
tibial torsion; intra-individual torsional difference; computed tomography; goniometry; malrotation;
D O I
10.1055/s-2004-813366
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine variability between clinical goniometric methods and computed tomography (CT) in measuring posttraumatic malrotation of the tibia. Materials and Methods: In a prospective study, absolute tibial torsion of both legs after unilateral fracture of the tibia as well as the difference between both legs (intra-individual torsional difference) was postoperatively determined with two goniometric and two CT methods in 40 patients (female : male = 16: 24, mean age = 46 +/- 34 years). Results: The mean difference between goniometric and CT methods in determining intra-individual torsional difference was not significant. Nevertheless, variance of values was higher in goniometric measurement (up to +/- 11 degree), with the measurements of torsional difference showing two times greater standard deviation in interobserver variability of goniometric methods as compared to CT. Conclusion: Goniometric methods do not significantly differ from the CT methods for determination of intraindividual torsional difference. The higher variance of interobserver values limits accuracy of goniometric methods. Therefore, goniometric determination of tibial torsion can only be considered an estimate but not a precise measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:1278 / 1284
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
ABERLE W, 1933, ARCH ORTHOP UNFALL C, V34, P56
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   MEASUREMENT OF TIBIAL TORSION - A NEW TECHNIQUE APPLICABLE TO ULTRASOUND AND COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
BUTLERMANUEL, PA ;
GUY, RL ;
HEATLEY, FW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1992, 65 (770) :119-126
[4]  
ECKHOFF DG, 1994, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P2
[5]  
Franzreb M., 1995, AKTUEL TRAUMATOL, V25, P153
[6]  
Grützner P, 1999, CHIRURG, V70, P276, DOI 10.1007/s001040050643
[7]   TIBIAL TORSION CALCULATED BY COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY AND COMPARED TO OTHER METHODS OF MEASUREMENT [J].
JAKOB, RP ;
HAERTEL, M ;
STUSSI, E .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1980, 62 (02) :238-242
[8]   A COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHIC METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF TIBIAL TORSION [J].
JEND, HH ;
HELLER, M ;
SCHONTAG, H ;
SCHOETTLE, H .
FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NUKLEARMEDIZIN, 1980, 133 (01) :22-25
[9]  
Keppler P, 1999, UNFALLCHIRURG, V102, P936
[10]  
Keppler P, 1999, ORTHOPADE, V28, P1015