Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery after failed percutaneous coronary intervention

被引:0
|
作者
Darwazah, A. K. [1 ]
Islim, I. [2 ]
Hanbali, B. [2 ]
Shama, R. A. [2 ]
Aloul, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Dept Cardiac Surg, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Makassed Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Jerusalem, Israel
来源
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY | 2009年 / 50卷 / 06期
关键词
Coronary artery bypass; Intra-aortic balloon pumping; Graft occlusion; vascular; ANGIOPLASTY; MULTICENTER; OPERATION; TRIAL; PTCA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim. The incidence of patients subjected to emergency coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is decreasing due to improvement of PCI technique and device technology. The aim of our study is to evaluate cases subjected to emergency CABG after complicated PCI to determine incidence, indications and results of surgery and to compare them with other emergency cases which are not related to angioplasty or stenting. Methods. From April 1999 to December 2005, 1 200 patients who underwent PCI were analysed. Those patients who developed complications related to PCI and required surgical intervention were included (PCI group N.=31). These patients were compared with other emergency cases not related to PCI (non-PCI group N.=48). The selection of these patients was based on the criteria of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Results. The incidence of PCI complications which necessitated emergency surgical intervention was 2.6%. The main indication was due to unsatisfactory angioplasty with ongoing myocardial ischemia (68%), stent thrombosis (13%), dissection (10%) retained angioplasty wire (6.5%), and perforation (3%). The incidence of cardiogenic shock, ongoing ischemia, acute infarction <24 h and the use of intra-aortic balloon pumps were similar among both groups. But the incidence of preoperative cardiac arrest was more in PCI patients (41.9% vs 22.9%, P=0.07). The timing of surgical intervention after termination of PCI varied from immediate transfer to 12 h (mean 3.4 +/- 3) while, in the non-PCI patients, the time was from 5-24 h (mean 13.3 +/- 6). Completeness of revascularization was similar among both groups. However, the mean number of grafts per patient was more in non-PCI group (2.4 +/- 0.9 vs 2.0 +/- 0.8, P=0.25). In-hospital mortality was 12.9% among PCI patients in comparison to 10.4% in non-PCI group (P=0.73). The combined incidence of major postoperative morbidity was more among PCI patients. Nevertheless, the difference was not significant except for acute renal failure. Conclusion. Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting among patients with PCI complications and those patients not related to PCI is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Although, the percentage of mortality and morbidity was more among PCI patients the difference between both groups was not significant. Surgical backup and collaboration between cardiologist and surgeons is needed to reduce delay in management and patients transfer to obtain the best surgical outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 800
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery after failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
    Andreasen, JJ
    Mortensen, PE
    Andersen, LI
    Arendrup, HC
    Ilkjær, LB
    Kjoller, M
    Thayssen, P
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2000, 34 (03) : 242 - 246
  • [2] Effect of abciximab on the outcome of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting after failed percutaneous coronary intervention
    Singh, M
    Nuttall, GA
    Ballman, KV
    Mullany, CJ
    Berger, PB
    Holmes, DR
    Bell, MR
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 76 (08) : 784 - 788
  • [3] Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era
    Seshadri, N
    Whitlow, PL
    Acharya, N
    Houghtaling, P
    Blackstone, EH
    Ellis, SG
    CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (18) : 2346 - 2350
  • [4] Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
    Moussa, Issam D.
    Stone, Gregg W.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (15) : 1508 - 1510
  • [5] Coronary artery bypass surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis: A critical reappraisal
    Kursaklioglu, Hurkan
    Celik, Turgay
    Iyisoy, Atila
    Yuksel, U. Cagdas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 127 (03) : 444 - 445
  • [6] Repeat revascularization: Percutaneous coronary intervention after coronary artery bypass graft surgery
    Scarsini, Roberto
    Zivelonghi, Carlo
    Pesarini, Gabriele
    Vassanelli, Corrado
    Ribichini, Flavio L.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (04) : 272 - 278
  • [7] Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients after previous coronary artery bypass surgery
    Zajac, Piotr
    Zycinski, Pawel
    Qawoq, Haval
    Jankowski, Lukasz
    Peruga, Jan
    Wcislo, Tomasz
    Pagorek, Piotr
    Peruga, Jan Z.
    Kasprzak, Jaroslaw D.
    Plewka, Michal
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2016, 74 (04) : 322 - 330
  • [8] Emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery for failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: Changes with the evolution of coronary stenting
    Corvaja, N
    Nishida, T
    Ferraro, M
    Briguori, C
    Yamashita, T
    Sallam, M
    Vaghetti, M
    Colombo, A
    CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (18) : 232 - 232
  • [9] Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Shahabuddin, Syed
    Sami, Shahid Ahmed
    Ansari, Junaid Alam
    Perveen, Shazia
    Furnaz, Shumaila
    Fatimi, Saulat
    Sharif, Hasanat
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2012, 22 (05): : 340 - 341
  • [10] Revascularization Options Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Kappetein, A. Pieter
    van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
    Head, Stuart J.
    HEART FAILURE CLINICS, 2016, 12 (01) : 135 - +