Emission characteristics of fine particulate matter from ultra-low emission power plants

被引:21
|
作者
Chen, Xiaojia [1 ]
Liu, Qizhen [3 ]
Yuan, Chao [2 ]
Sheng, Tao [3 ]
Zhang, Xufeng [1 ]
Han, Deming [1 ]
Xu, Zhefeng [1 ]
Huang, Xiqian [1 ]
Liao, Haoxiang [1 ]
Jiang, Yilun [2 ]
Dong, Wei [2 ]
Fu, Qingyan [3 ]
Cheng, Jinping [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Baosteel Ind Technol Serv Co LTD, Shanghai 201900, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Environm Monitor Ctr, Shanghai 200235, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Power plant; PM2.5; Dilution stack sampling; Emission factors; Source profile; Source markers; SOURCE PROFILES; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; RIVER DELTA; PM2.5; CHINA; INVENTORY; INDUSTRIAL; POLLUTANTS; ELEMENTS; DATABASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113157
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As one of the highest energy consuming and polluting industries, the power generation industry is an important source of particulate matter emissions. Recently, implementation of ultra-low emission technology has changed the emission characteristic of fine particulate matter (PM2.5). In this study, PM2.5 emitted from four typical power plants in China was sampled using a dilution channel sampling system, and analyzed for elements, water-soluble ions and carbonaceous fractions. The results showed that PM2.5 concentrations emitted from the four power plants were 0.78 +/- 0.16, 0.63 +/- 0.09, 0.29 +/- 0.07 and 0.28 +/- 0.01 mg m(-3), respectively. Emission factors were 0.004-0.005 g/kg coal, nearly 1-2 orders of magnitude lower than those reported in previous studies. The highest proportions of PM2.5 consisted of organic carbon (OC), SO42-, elemental carbon (EC), NH4+, Al and Cl-. Coefficients of divergence (CDs) were in the ranges 0.22-0.41 (for an individual plant), 0.43-0.69 (among different plants), and 0.60-0.99 (in previous studies). The results indicated that the source profiles of each tested power plant were relatively similar, but differed from those in previous studies. Enrichment factors showed elevated Se and Hg, in accordance with the source markers Se and As. Comparing source profiles with previous studies, the proportion of OC, EC and NH4+ were higher, while the proportion of Al in PM2.5 were relatively lower. The OC/EC ratio became concentrated at similar to 5. Results from this study can be used for source apportionment and emission inventory calculations after implementation of ultra-low emission technologies. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Temporal and spatial dynamics in emission of water-soluble ions in fine particulate matter during forest fires in Southwest China
    Zhan, Xiaoyu
    Ma, Yuanfan
    Huang, Ziyan
    Zheng, Chenyue
    Lin, Haichuan
    Tigabu, Mulualem
    Guo, Futao
    FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, 2023, 6
  • [42] Comprehensive understanding of SO3 effects on synergies among air pollution control devices in ultra-low emission power plants burning high-sulfur coal
    Yang, Zhengda
    Ji, Peidong
    Li, Qingyi
    Jiang, Ye
    Zheng, Chenghang
    Wang, Yi
    Gao, Xiang
    Lin, Riyi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 239
  • [43] Impact of Emission Standards on Fine Particulate Matter Toxicity: A Long-Term Analysis in Los Angeles
    Badami, Mohammad Mahdi
    Aghaei, Yashar
    Sioutas, Constantinos
    TOXICS, 2025, 13 (02)
  • [44] Emission characteristics and exposure assessment of particulate matter and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) from waste printed circuit boards de-soldering
    Guo, Jie
    Ji, Ang
    Wang, Jianbo
    Ogunseitan, Oladele A.
    Xu, Zhenming
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 662 : 530 - 536
  • [45] Migration and emission characteristics of N-alkanes and phthalates in condensable particulate matter from coal-fired sources
    Wu, Yujia
    Xu, Zhenyao
    Liu, Siqi
    Tang, Minghui
    Lu, Shengyong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 305 (305)
  • [46] Emission Characteristics of Gaseous and Particulate Mercury from a Subcritical Power Plant Co-Firing Coal and Sludge
    Li, Changkang
    Wen, Chang
    Wang, Dapeng
    Zhao, Changxi
    Li, Rui
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (10)
  • [47] Effects of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization and Wet Electrostatic Precipitator on Particulate Matter and Sulfur Oxide Emission in Coal-Fired Power Plants
    Yang, Fuxin
    Liu, Hexin
    Feng, Peng
    Li, Zhenghong
    Tan, Houzhang
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2020, 34 (12) : 16423 - 16432
  • [48] Emission characteristics of Cd, Pb and Mn from coal combustion: Field study at coal-fired power plants in China
    Deng, Shuang
    Shi, Yingjie
    Liu, Yu
    Zhang, Chen
    Wang, Xiangfeng
    Cao, Qing
    Li, Songgeng
    Zhang, Fan
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 126 : 469 - 475
  • [49] Modeling of arsenic migration and emission characteristics in coal-fired power plants
    Zhao, Yan
    Zhang, Cheng
    Ma, Lun
    Yu, Shenghui
    Yuan, Changle
    Li, Junchen
    Tan, Peng
    Fang, Qingyan
    Luo, Guangqian
    Chen, Gang
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2024, 465
  • [50] Emission Source Areas of Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
    Nguyen, Tuyet Nam Thi
    Du, Nguyen Xuan
    Hoa, Nguyen Thi
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (03)