Deliberative assessment of surrogate consent in dementia research

被引:24
作者
Kim, Scott Y. H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Uhlmann, Rebecca A. [2 ]
Appelbaum, Paul S. [4 ,5 ]
Knopman, David S. [6 ]
Kim, H. Myra [7 ]
Damschroder, Laura [8 ]
Beattie, Elizabeth [9 ]
Struble, Laura [10 ]
De Vries, Raymond [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Bioeth Program, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ctr Behav & Decis Sci Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychiat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychiat, Div Law Eth & Psychiat, New York, NY USA
[5] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, New York, NY 10032 USA
[6] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol, Rochester, MN USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Ctr Stat Consultat & Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[8] Ann Arbor Vet Adm Med Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[9] Queensland Univ Technol, Dementia Collaborat Res Ctr, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[10] Univ Michigan, Sch Nursing, Div Acute Crit & Long Term Care Programs, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; Informed consent; Deliberative democracy; Bioethics; Research ethics; Surrogate-based research; Impaired decision-making capacity; ALZHEIMER-DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jalz.2009.06.001
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Research involving incapacitated persons with dementia entails complex scientific, legal, anti ethical issues, making traditional surveys of layperson views on the ethics of such research challenging. We therefore assessed the impact of democratic deliberation (DD), involving balanced, detailed education and peer deliberation, on the views of those responsible for persons with dementia. Methods: One hundred and seventy-eight community-recruited caregivers or primary decision-makers for persons with dementia were randomly assigned to either an all-day DD session group or a control group. Educational materials used for the DD session were vetted for balance and accuracy by an interdisciplinary advisory panel. We assessed the acceptability of family-surrogate consent for dementia research ("surrogate-based research") from a societal policy perspective as well as from the more personal perspectives of deciding for a loved one or for oneself (surrogate and self-perspectives), assessed at baseline, immediately post-DD session, and 1 month after DD date, for four research scenarios of varying risk-benefit profiles. Results: At baseline, a majority in both the DD and control groups supported a policy of family consent for dementia research in all research scenarios. The support for a policy of family consent for surrogate-based research increased in the DD group, but not in the control group. The change in the DD group was maintained 1 month later. In the DD group, there were transient changes in attitudes from surrogate or self-perspectives. In the control group, there were no changes from baseline in attitude toward surrogate consent from any perspective. Conclusions: Intensive, balanced, and accurate education, along with peer deliberation provided by democratic deliberation, led to a sustained increase in support for a societal policy of family consent in dementia research among those responsible for dementia patients. (C) 2010 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 350
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
BRAVO G, 2003, INT J SOC RES PRACT, V2, P49
[2]   Alzheimer disease: Current concepts and emerging diagnostic and therapeutic strategies [J].
Clark, CM ;
Karlawish, JHT .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (05) :400-410
[3]   Patients, privacy and trust: Patients' willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records [J].
Damschroder, Laura J. ;
Pritts, Joy L. ;
Neblo, Michael A. ;
Kalarickal, Rosemarie J. ;
Creswell, John W. ;
Hayward, Rodney A. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2007, 64 (01) :223-235
[4]   Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study [J].
Ferri, CP ;
Prince, M ;
Brayne, C ;
Brodaty, H ;
Fratiglioni, L ;
Ganguli, M ;
Hall, K ;
Hasegawa, K ;
Hendrie, H ;
Huang, YQ ;
Jorm, A ;
Mathers, C ;
Menezes, PR ;
Rimmer, E ;
Scazufca, M .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9503) :2112-2117
[5]   Beyond polling alone: The quest for an informed public [J].
Fishkin, James S. .
CRITICAL REVIEW, 2006, 18 (1-3) :157-165
[6]   Deliberating about bioethics [J].
Gutmann, A ;
Thompson, D .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1997, 27 (03) :38-41
[7]  
Hoffman D E, 1998, J Health Care Law Policy, V1, P123
[8]   Older Adults' Attitudes Toward Enrollment of Non-competent Subjects Participating in Alzheimer's Research [J].
Karlawish, Jason ;
Rubright, Jonathan ;
Casarett, David ;
Cary, Mark ;
Ten Have, Thomas ;
Sankar, Pamela .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 166 (02) :182-188
[9]   Surrogate consent for dementia research A national survey of older Americans [J].
Kim, S. Y. H. ;
Kim, H. M. ;
Langa, K. M. ;
Karlawish, J. H. T. ;
Knopman, D. S. ;
Appelbaum, P. S. .
NEUROLOGY, 2009, 72 (02) :149-155
[10]   What do people at risk for Alzheimer disease think about surrogate consent for research? [J].
Kim, SYH ;
Kim, HM ;
McCallum, C ;
Tariot, PN .
NEUROLOGY, 2005, 65 (09) :1395-1401