How safe is hospital-in-the-home care?

被引:33
作者
Montalto, M
机构
[1] Frankston Hospital, Dept. of Pub. Hlth. and Comm. Med., University of Melbourne, Vic.
[2] Centre for Health Program Evaluation, PO Box 477, West Heidelberg
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb140161.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe the rate of negative, unexpected and adverse events associated with hospital-in-the-home (HIH) care in an established unit, and to validate indicators of safety for HIH care. Design: Prospective descriptive survey. Patients and setting: 231 patients, who would otherwise have required hospitalisation, accepted for acute home-based care by the HIH unit at Frankston Hospital, a 350-bed hospital serving a population of 240 000 on the south-eastern boundary of Melbourne. Main outcome measures: The following indicators of safety: patient telephone calls to the on-call service; unscheduled staff callout to patients' homes; return to hospital during an HIH admission; and return to hospital after discharge. Results: 190 acute admissions were examined. Planned same-day admissions were uneventful and excluded from the analysis. The therapies provided were intravenous therapy (mainly antibiotics), anticoagulation, and wound care. Unplanned patient telephone calls were received in 6.3% of admissions; 5.8% of acute admissions required an unscheduled staff home attendance; 4.2% of episodes resulted in a return to hospital, of which 2.6% required continued care in hospital; 2.2% of episodes resulted in a return to hospital within 14 days of discharge for a related problem. The rate of iatrogenic adverse events was 3.5%. Conclusions: HIH care is very safe. This study may help define safety standards for HIH care so that future studies can compare them with those of traditional inpatient care.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 280
页数:4
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] HOME ANTIBIOTIC-THERAPY FOR STREPTOCOCCAL ENDOCARDITIS - A CALL FOR A CONTROLLED TRIAL
    COLFORD, JM
    CORELLI, RL
    GANZ, JW
    GUGLIELMO, BJ
    JACOBS, RA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 94 (01) : 111 - 112
  • [2] GLOUCESTER HOSPITAL-AT-HOME - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    DONALD, IP
    BALDWIN, RN
    BANNERJEE, M
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 1995, 24 (05) : 434 - 439
  • [3] GRAYSON L, 1996, AUSTR HOM OUTP INTR
  • [4] HOME INTRAVENOUS ANTIBIOTIC-THERAPY - A SAFE AND EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE TO INPATIENT CARE
    GRAYSON, ML
    SILVERS, J
    TURNIDGE, J
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1995, 162 (05) : 249 - 253
  • [5] Hankwitz P E, 1991, Clin Geriatr Med, V7, P847
  • [6] ILLIFFE S, 1995, BR J HLTH CARE MANAG, V1, P663
  • [7] Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home
    Koopman, MMW
    Prandoni, P
    Piovella, F
    Ockelford, PA
    Brandjes, DPM
    vanderMeer, J
    Gallus, AS
    Simonneau, G
    Chesterman, CH
    Prins, MH
    Bossuyt, PMM
    deHaes, H
    vandenBelt, AGM
    Sagnard, L
    DAzemar, P
    Buller, HR
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (11) : 682 - 687
  • [8] ASSESSING AND ASSURING THE QUALITY OF HOME HEALTH-CARE - A CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK
    KRAMER, AM
    SHAUGHNESSY, PW
    BAUMAN, MK
    CRISLER, KS
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 1990, 68 (03) : 413 - 443
  • [9] A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis
    Levine, M
    Gent, M
    Hirsh, J
    Leclerc, J
    Anderson, D
    Weitz, J
    Ginsberg, J
    Turpie, AG
    Demers, C
    Kovacs, M
    Geerts, W
    Kassis, J
    Desjardins, L
    Cusson, J
    Cruickshank, M
    Powers, P
    Brien, W
    Haley, S
    Willan, A
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (11) : 677 - 681
  • [10] Home chemotherapy for cancer patients: Cost analysis and safety
    Lowenthal, RM
    Piaszczyk, A
    Arthur, GE
    OMalley, S
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1996, 165 (04) : 184 - 187