Use of Scleral Lenses and Miniscleral Lenses After Penetrating Keratoplasty

被引:32
作者
Barnett, Melissa [1 ]
Lien, Vivian [1 ]
Li, Jennifer Y. [1 ]
Durbin-Johnson, Blythe [1 ]
Mannis, Mark J. [1 ]
机构
[1] UC Davis Hlth Syst Eye Ctr, 4860 Y St,Suite 2400, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
来源
EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE | 2016年 / 42卷 / 03期
关键词
Scleral lens; Contact lens; Penetrating keratoplasty; Keratoconus; Scleral lens fitting; CONTACT-LENSES;
D O I
10.1097/ICL.0000000000000163
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To examine the clinical outcomes of scleral lenses for visual rehabilitation after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Methods: A retrospective review was conducted for 34 patients (48 eyes) who had a history of prior PK and were fit with scleral lenses between October 2009 and December 2013 at the UC Davis Eye Center. Results: The most common initial indication for PK was keratoconus in 27 eyes (56%). Thirty-three eyes (69%) had previously been fit with other types of contact lenses, with small-diameter rigid gas-permeable lenses being the most common. The improvement in best-corrected visual acuity with a scleral lens compared with prior spectacle refraction or other contact lens was a mean of two best-corrected visual acuity lines. Forty-four eyes (91.7%) achieved functional vision with best scleral lens-corrected visual acuities of 20/40 or better. Patients who continued wearing scleral lenses were significantly more likely to report "good" subjective vision compared with patients who abandoned scleral lens wear (P=0.009), although change in objective best-corrected visual acuity did not differ significantly. There were no cases of infectious keratitis. Six eyes (12.5%) developed graft rejection; 3 were able to resume scleral lens wear. Nineteen eyes (39.5%) discontinued scleral lens wear for various reasons, the most common reason for discontinuation of lens wear was difficulty with scleral lens insertion or removal (8 eyes, 42.1%). Conclusion: Scleral lenses are effective and safe in patients who have had PK. There was a mean gain in visual acuity, with the majority of patients achieving 20/40 vision or better. The patient's subjective perception of vision was a significant factor in determining whether scleral lens wear was continued or abandoned.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 189
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   PROSE treatment of corneal ectasia [J].
Baran, Inna ;
Bradley, James A. ;
Alipour, Fateme ;
Rosenthal, Perry ;
Le, Hong-Gam ;
Jacobs, Deborah S. .
CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2012, 35 (05) :222-227
[2]  
Bates D., 2014, J Stat Softw, DOI [DOI 10.18637/JSS.V067.I01, 10.18637/jss.v067.i01]
[3]  
BEEKHUIS W H, 1991, CLAO Journal, V17, P27
[4]   Photorefractive keratectomy for post-penetrating keratoplasty myopia and astigmatism [J].
Bilgihan, K ;
Özdek, SC ;
Akata, F ;
Hasanreisoglu, B .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 26 (11) :1590-1595
[5]   Visual outcome in corneal grafts: a preliminary analysis of the Swedish Corneal Transplant Register [J].
Claesson, M ;
Armitage, WJ ;
Fagerholm, P ;
Stenevi, U .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 86 (02) :174-180
[6]   DISEASE AND RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH CONTACT-LENSES [J].
DART, JKG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 77 (01) :49-53
[7]   A new technique for rigid gas permeable contact lens fitting following penetrating keratoplasty [J].
Eggink, FAGJ ;
Nuijts, RMMA .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 79 (03) :245-250
[8]   Indications, Visual Outcome, and Ectasia in Clear Corneal Transplants 20 Years Old or More [J].
Felipe, Anthony F. ;
Hammersmith, Kristin M. ;
Nottage, Jennifer M. ;
Rapuano, Christopher J. ;
Nagra, Parveen K. ;
Cohen, Elisabeth J. ;
Laibson, Peter R. .
CORNEA, 2013, 32 (05) :602-607
[9]   RELAXING INCISIONS FOR POSTKERATOPLASTY ASTIGMATISM [J].
FRONTERRE, A ;
PORTESANI, GP .
CORNEA, 1991, 10 (04) :305-311
[10]   Contact lenses and special back surface design after penetrating keratoplasty to improve contact lens fit and visual outcome [J].
Gruenauer-Kloevekorn, C ;
Kloevekorn-Fischer, U ;
Duncker, GIW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 89 (12) :1601-1608