Empowering learners with personalised learning approaches? Agency, equity and transparency in the context of learning analytics

被引:58
作者
Tsai, Yi-Shan [1 ]
Perrotta, Carlo [2 ]
Gasevic, Dragan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Informat, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Educ, Clayton, Vic, Australia
关键词
Learning analytics; agency; equity; transparency; SURVEILLANCE; MOTIVATION; EDUCATION; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2019.1676396
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The emergence of personalised data technologies such as learning analytics is framed as a solution to manage the needs of higher education student populations that are growing ever more diverse and larger in size. However, the current approach to learning analytics presents tensions between increasing student agency in making learning-related decisions and 'datafying' students in the process of collecting, analysing and interpreting data. This article presents a study that explores staff and student experience of agency, equity and transparency in existing data practices and expectations towards learning analytics in a UK university. The results show a number of intertwined factors that have contributed to the tensions between enhancing a learner's control of their studies and, at the same time, diminishing their autonomy as an active agent in the process of learning analytics. This article argues that learner empowerment should not be automatically assumed to have taken place as part of the adoption of learning analytics. Instead, the interwoven power relationships in a complex educational system and the interactions between humans and machines need to be taken into consideration when presenting learning analytics as an equitable process to enhance student agency and educational equity.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 567
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Acquisti A., 2007, WHAT CAN BEHAV EC TE, P363, DOI [DOI 10.1201/9781420052183.CH18, 10.1201/9781420052183.ch18]
[2]  
Agre P. E., 1994, Information Society, V10, P101, DOI 10.1080/01972243.1994.9960162
[3]   Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability [J].
Ananny, Mike ;
Crawford, Kate .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2018, 20 (03) :973-989
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Liquid Surveillance: A Conversation
[5]  
Castaneda L., 2018, International journal of educational technology in higher education, V15
[6]   Learning Analytics Dashboards to Support Adviser-Student Dialogue [J].
Charleer, Sven ;
Vande Moere, Andrew ;
Klerkx, Joris ;
Verbert, Katrien ;
De Laet, Tinne .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 11 (03) :389-399
[7]   An overview of learning analytics [J].
Clow, Doug .
TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 18 (06) :683-695
[8]   Learner Dispositions, Self-Theories and Student Engagement [J].
Deakin Crick, Ruth ;
Goldspink, Chris .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2014, 62 (01) :19-35
[9]   Co-Creation Strategies for Learning Analytics [J].
Dollinger, Mollie ;
Lodge, Jason M. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE (LAK'18): TOWARDS USER-CENTRED LEARNING ANALYTICS, 2018, :97-101
[10]  
EC, 2016, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.WOCN.2016.08.005