Long-term effects of fluoxetine or vehicle administration during pregnancy on behavioral outcomes in guinea pig offspring

被引:18
作者
Vartazarmian, R
Malik, S
Baker, GB
Boksa, P
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Psychiat, Douglas Hosp, Res Ctr, Verdun, PQ H4H 1R3, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Psychiat, W Mackenzie Hlth Sci Ctr, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R7, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
antidepressant; body weight; fluoxetine; guinea pig; pain; pregnancy; prepulse inhibition; prenatal; startle; stress;
D O I
10.1007/s00213-004-2003-7
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Rationale: Assessment of the benefits versus risks associated with antidepressant use during pregnancy must include an analysis of possible drug effects on fetal development. Human studies indicate that prenatal fluoxetine exposure is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Animal modeling may provide useful information concerning possible long-term effects of prenatal fluoxetine exposure. Limitations in previous such studies using rat models may be overcome using a guinea pig model in which fluoxetine is delivered by osmotic pump throughout pregnancy. Methods: Initial experiments measured the half-life of fluoxetine and dosing required to achieve human therapeutic blood levels in the guinea pig. In subsequent experiments, guinea pigs received fluoxetine or vehicle via osmotic pump or no treatment throughout pregnancy. Outcome measures included: pregnancy characteristics, weight gain, and, in offspring as adults, pain threshold, acoustic startle responses and prepulse inhibition. Results: There was no effect of treatment group on gestation length, number of live-births or still-births, maternal or offspring weight gain, and acoustic startle responses. In adult offspring, pain threshold was decreased by vehicle treatment during gestation. Prenatal fluoxetine increased pain threshold, relative to vehicle controls. Prepulse inhibition of startle was increased in adult offspring treated prenatally with either vehicle or fluoxetine compared to no treatment. Conclusions: The guinea pig provides a practicable and clinically relevant model of prenatal fluoxetine exposure. Adult guinea pigs exposed to fluoxetine prenatally showed increased thermal pain thresholds but no change in prepulse inhibition, indicating selective long-term effects of prenatal fluoxetine on serotonin-modulated behaviors. Further studies on long-term effects of prenatal fluoxetine on nociception are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 338
页数:11
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Amsterdam JD, 1997, AM J PSYCHIAT, V154, P963
[2]   Can adverse neonatal experiences alter brain development and subsequent behavior? [J].
Anand, KJS ;
Scalzo, FM .
BIOLOGY OF THE NEONATE, 2000, 77 (02) :69-82
[3]   Point prevalence of psychiatric disorders during the second trimester of pregnancy:: A population-based study [J].
Andersson, L ;
Sundström-Poromaa, I ;
Bixo, M ;
Wulff, M ;
Bondestam, K ;
Åström, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (01) :148-154
[4]  
Ansari A, 2000, HARVARD REV PSYCHIAT, V7, P257
[5]   Stressed-out, or in (utero)? [J].
Avishai-Eliner, S ;
Brunson, KL ;
Sandman, CA ;
Baram, TZ .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2002, 25 (10) :518-524
[6]   DEVELOPMENT OF ENZYMES OF ENERGY-METABOLISM IN THE BRAIN OF A PRECOCIAL (GUINEA-PIG) AND NON-PRECOCIAL (RAT) SPECIES [J].
BOOTH, RFG ;
PATEL, TB ;
CLARK, JB .
JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, 1980, 34 (01) :17-25
[7]   Prenatal immune challenge disrupts sensorimotor gating in adult rats:: Implications for the etiopathogenesis of schizophrenia [J].
Borrell, J ;
Vela, JM ;
Arévalo-Martin, A ;
Molina-Holgado, E ;
Guaza, C .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 26 (02) :204-215
[8]   SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF N,N-DIMETHYLNITROSAMINE MUTAGENICITY IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER BY DIMETHYLSULFOXIDE [J].
BRODBERG, RK ;
MITCHELL, MJ ;
SMITH, SL ;
WOODRUFF, RC .
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 1987, 10 (04) :425-432
[9]   Fluoxetine and norfluoxetine plasma concentrations during relapse-prevention treatment [J].
Brunswick, DJ ;
Amsterdam, JD ;
Fawcett, J ;
Quitkin, FM ;
Reimherr, FW ;
Rosenbaum, JF ;
Beasley, CM .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2002, 68 (2-3) :243-249
[10]  
Burt VK, 2002, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V63, P9