A new criterion for detection of radiculopathy based on motor evoked potentials and intraoperative nerve root monitoring

被引:5
作者
Traba, Alfredo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Romero, Juan Pablo [3 ,4 ]
Arranz, Beatriz [1 ]
Vilela, Concepcion [5 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, Clin Neurophysiol Dept, C Dr Esquerdo 46, Madrid 28007, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ HM Sanchinarro, Neurol & Neurophysiol, C Ona 10, Madrid 28050, Spain
[3] Francisco de Vitoria Univ, Fac Expt Sci, Carretera Pozuelo Majadahonda Km 1,800, Madrid 28223, Spain
[4] Hosp Beata Maria Ana, Brain Damage Unit, C Dr Esquerdo 83, Madrid 28007, Spain
[5] Hosp Vithas 9 Octubre, Neurophysiol & Evoked Potentials, C Vall de la Ballestera 59, Valencia 46015, Spain
关键词
Transcranial electrical stimulation; Motor evoked potential; Intraoperative radiculopathy; MEP area; SPINAL-CORD; SURGERY; DEFORMITY; EFFICACY; INJURY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2018.07.005
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Our objective is to use the area of the motor evoked potential (MEP) as a diagnostic tool for intraoperative radicular injury. Methods: We analyzed the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring data and clinical outcomes of 203 patients treated for dorsolumbar spine deformity. The decrease in amplitude was compared with the reduction in the MEP area. Results: In 11 cases, new intraoperative injuries occurred, nine of them were lumbar radiculopathies. Our new criteria, a decrease MEP area of 70%, yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 1, since it detected all the radicular injuries, with no false positive cases. Using a 70% amplitude decrease criteria, we obtained a sensitivity of 0,89 and a specificity of 0,99. A lower threshold (65% amplitude reduction) yielded a higher number of false positives, whereas a higher threshold (75 and 80%) gave rise to a higher number of false negatives. Conclusions: The measurement of the MEP area gave evidence to be more reliable and accurate than the measurement of the amplitude reduction in order to assess and detect intraoperative radicular injuries. Significance: The criterion of decrease of the MEP area has a higher reliability and accuracy in the detection of intraoperative radicular lesions than the amplitude reduction. (C) 2018 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2075 / 2082
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy - A 10-year assessment [J].
Buchowski, Jacob M. ;
Bridwell, Keith H. ;
Lenke, Lawrence G. ;
Kuhns, Craig A. ;
Lehman, Ronald A., Jr. ;
Kim, Youngjung J. ;
Stewart, David ;
Baldus, Chris .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (20) :2245-2252
[2]   Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: A review focus on the corticospinal tracts [J].
Deletis, Vedran ;
Sala, Francesco .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 119 (02) :248-264
[3]   A neurophysiological approach to brainstem reflexes. Blink reflex [J].
Esteban, A .
NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 29 (01) :7-38
[4]   Intraoperative neurophysiologic detection of iatrogenic C5 nerve root injury during laminectomy for cervical compression myelopathy [J].
Fan, DP ;
Schwartz, DM ;
Vaccaro, AR ;
Hilibrand, AS ;
Albert, TJ .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (22) :2499-2502
[5]   Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring in spine surgery. Developments and state of the art in France in 2011 [J].
Gavaret, M. ;
Jouve, J. L. ;
Pereon, Y. ;
Accadbled, F. ;
Andre-Obadia, N. ;
Azabou, E. ;
Blondel, B. ;
Bollini, G. ;
Delecrin, J. ;
Farcy, J. -P. ;
Fournet-Fayard, J. ;
Garin, C. ;
Henry, P. ;
Manel, V. ;
Mutschler, V. ;
Perrin, G. ;
de Gauzy, J. Sales .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2013, 99 (06) :S319-S327
[6]   Iatrogenic neurologic deficit after lumbar spine surgery: A review [J].
Ghobrial, George M. ;
Williams, Kim A., Jr. ;
Arnold, Paul ;
Fehlings, Michael ;
Harrop, James S. .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 139 :76-80
[7]   The effects from lumbar nerve root transection in rats on spinal somatosensory and motor-evoked potentials [J].
Jou, IM .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (02) :147-155
[8]   The Interpretation of Muscle Motor Evoked Potentials for Spinal Cord Monitoring [J].
Kothbauer, Karl F. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 34 (01) :32-37
[9]   Transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity -: A study of 145 patients [J].
Langeloo, DD ;
Lelivelt, A ;
Journée, HL ;
Slappendel, R ;
de Kleuver, M .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (10) :1043-1050
[10]  
Legatt AD, 2016, J CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V33, P42, DOI 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000253